Veterinary doctor.
You don't "detox" from a vaccine. That's not how it works.
Helpful Info. Covid19, shots and vaccines treatments.
- Thread starter Proud Prepper
- Start date
Help Support Doomsday Prepper Forums:
You don't "detox" from a vaccine. That's not how it works.
The rest of my post screwed up somehow, but this doc is a vet. I don't comment on anything animal, I have no freaking idea.
I'm sure @EastenerWesterner 's wife can school me on all of it. She is much smarter than me on that stuff. But I'm sure she would leave treating ICU people to me.
These people need to stay in their lane. Just because they have "Dr" before their name, does not mean they are qualified to speak on this subject.
I'm sure @EastenerWesterner 's wife can school me on all of it. She is much smarter than me on that stuff. But I'm sure she would leave treating ICU people to me.
These people need to stay in their lane. Just because they have "Dr" before their name, does not mean they are qualified to speak on this subject.
It's not a vaccine, only called a vaccine. I know many medical doctors that are idiots in certain medical fields. If you speak the truth, it doesn't matter if your knowledge was certified by an academic institution or not.
You should stay in your lane and follow bureaucratic protocols from your Tyrranical master's.
Digout
Active Member
Just a thought........
What a Con job we are being exposed to.
We "need" 2 jabs to get covered against "The Bug"
"The Jabs" do not stop you getting "The Bug"
"The Jabs" do not stop you passing on "The Bug"
After 6 months you need to get a "Booster" jab. (Sounds like a lunar launch)
So after another 6 months (ie in 12 Months) will we require another "Booster" jab?
Since the pandemic began, why have they not developed a "Jab" that actually works?
The world community is paying billions for an ineffective "Jab"
Don't you wish you are hold shares in J & J, AstraZenica, Pfizer and Moderna?
What a Con job we are being exposed to.
We "need" 2 jabs to get covered against "The Bug"
"The Jabs" do not stop you getting "The Bug"
"The Jabs" do not stop you passing on "The Bug"
After 6 months you need to get a "Booster" jab. (Sounds like a lunar launch)
So after another 6 months (ie in 12 Months) will we require another "Booster" jab?
Since the pandemic began, why have they not developed a "Jab" that actually works?
The world community is paying billions for an ineffective "Jab"
Don't you wish you are hold shares in J & J, AstraZenica, Pfizer and Moderna?
I know many people that are idiots and have no idea how to understand basic science. What’s your point?
Sure do since there were over 500 BILLIONAIRES created from this Clot Shot that does nothing to stop covid!
My point is not every MD knows what there doing in regards to medicine, even you.
It doesn't mean a veterinarian can't understand medical science unless it pertains to animal's.
This thread is about discussing treatments for the dangerous so called vaccine, such as removing the spike proteins and other garbage in the them.
You do not know what your speaking of when you claim you can't detox from what you call a covid vaccine.
Ivermectin has become the latest battleground between science and misinformation. But who is profiting from prescribing this drug
The Intercept gained access to hacked data from online medical consultations. A network of health care providers has pocketed millions of dollars selling hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin, and online consultations.
The data collected indicates that patients spent at least $15 million dollars on medical consultations and medications. America’s frontline doctors (AFLDs), a right-wing group founded by pro-Trump doctors, have been working in tandem with a small network of companies to spread distrust in vaccines and encourage patients to pay for alternative consultations and ineffective (and potentially dangerous) treatments.
The data were obtained from two companies, CadenceHealth and Ravkoo. AFLDs referred many followers to a telemedicine partner which uses CadenceHealth. Patients were charged $90 each for phone consultations, many of whom never received a call. When ivermectin and other drugs were prescribed, Ravkoo was the company delivering them.
In only 2 months, it is estimated that individuals spent $6.7 million for consultations. From November 2020 to September 2021, 340,000 prescriptions were filled at Ravkoo, totaling an estimated $8.5 million in revenue.
In 2 months, the AFLDs referred over 255,000 people seeking “COVID-19 treatments.” 72,000 people paid $90 for consultations and many also paid $59.99 for follow-ups, which is more than $6.7M in phone calls. It appears these fees are being charged directly to the patient, not to insurance. Via Ravkoo, more than $4.7M was spent on ivermectin, $2.4M in azithromycin and $1.2M in hydroxychloroquine.
Besides providing medications that are known to be ineffective at treating COVID-19 and in fact, can be dangerous to people, the website’s security was very weak, and both CadenceHealth and Ravkoo likely violated HIPAA by having such weak security implemented. It’s truly unfortunate that so many people have been impacted by these predatory practices.
From- unbiased science podcast
https://www.unbiasedscipod.com/
Sources:
Network of Right-Wing Health Care Providers Is Making Millions Off Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin, Hacked Data Reveals
Merck Statement on Ivermectin use During the COVID-19 Pandemic - Merck.com
https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/tech-news/ivermectin-demand-drives-trump-telemedicine-website-rcna1791
follow the money… as I’ve heard others say.
I don’t understand why people don’t trust their primary docs who don’t stand to profit off a pandemic and instead chose to trust an online persona who is clearly making a huge profit from selling “time” (in the form of a “consultation”) and drugs.
The Intercept gained access to hacked data from online medical consultations. A network of health care providers has pocketed millions of dollars selling hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin, and online consultations.
The data collected indicates that patients spent at least $15 million dollars on medical consultations and medications. America’s frontline doctors (AFLDs), a right-wing group founded by pro-Trump doctors, have been working in tandem with a small network of companies to spread distrust in vaccines and encourage patients to pay for alternative consultations and ineffective (and potentially dangerous) treatments.
The data were obtained from two companies, CadenceHealth and Ravkoo. AFLDs referred many followers to a telemedicine partner which uses CadenceHealth. Patients were charged $90 each for phone consultations, many of whom never received a call. When ivermectin and other drugs were prescribed, Ravkoo was the company delivering them.
In only 2 months, it is estimated that individuals spent $6.7 million for consultations. From November 2020 to September 2021, 340,000 prescriptions were filled at Ravkoo, totaling an estimated $8.5 million in revenue.
In 2 months, the AFLDs referred over 255,000 people seeking “COVID-19 treatments.” 72,000 people paid $90 for consultations and many also paid $59.99 for follow-ups, which is more than $6.7M in phone calls. It appears these fees are being charged directly to the patient, not to insurance. Via Ravkoo, more than $4.7M was spent on ivermectin, $2.4M in azithromycin and $1.2M in hydroxychloroquine.
Besides providing medications that are known to be ineffective at treating COVID-19 and in fact, can be dangerous to people, the website’s security was very weak, and both CadenceHealth and Ravkoo likely violated HIPAA by having such weak security implemented. It’s truly unfortunate that so many people have been impacted by these predatory practices.
From- unbiased science podcast
https://www.unbiasedscipod.com/
Sources:
Network of Right-Wing Health Care Providers Is Making Millions Off Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin, Hacked Data Reveals
Merck Statement on Ivermectin use During the COVID-19 Pandemic - Merck.com
https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/tech-news/ivermectin-demand-drives-trump-telemedicine-website-rcna1791
follow the money… as I’ve heard others say.
I don’t understand why people don’t trust their primary docs who don’t stand to profit off a pandemic and instead chose to trust an online persona who is clearly making a huge profit from selling “time” (in the form of a “consultation”) and drugs.
Hundreds of millions of people in India, Japan, over a dozen African countries and many others, including the US,, using Ivermectin and showing real effective results would disagree with your statement that Ivermectin is dangerous and ineffective at treating covid19. Every drug and substance can be dangerous if not taken properly in a safe dosage, even water! When used as a preventative treatment, it's highly effective, it's not an effective treatment once your already diseased by covid.
You come off as a hack and a quack. Your a propagandists for the biggest drug scammers in history,, that are protected by corrupt governments. What you posted has nothing to do with this thread and distorts treatments as a scam, when it's scammers are using an effective treatment in there scam. What does the web site security of what you call a scanner have to do with this topic?
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jun 16, 2021
- Messages
- 3,568
- Reaction score
- 15,715
@DrJenner actually the medicine is the same, just dosages and nuances different. Much like your patients, hers can‘t talk to her.
She consulted a Burn specialist MD on some burned puppies and he came in and got most of the credit. She reads NE journal of Med.
She is fun to bring to Dr Appointments. Had a Workmans Comp Dr that always sent in another Dr after that because she ran circles around him.
The woman in the video is wrong because the Astra Zeneca isn’t a MRNA..
She consulted a Burn specialist MD on some burned puppies and he came in and got most of the credit. She reads NE journal of Med.
She is fun to bring to Dr Appointments. Had a Workmans Comp Dr that always sent in another Dr after that because she ran circles around him.
The woman in the video is wrong because the Astra Zeneca isn’t a MRNA..
The info I posted was from unbiased science podcast as I stated there.
Do what you want - as I’ve said I don’t care if you inject bleach or take a borax bath.
You constantly tout unproven dangerous therapies as facts because they line up with your theories -and produce ridiculous citations for them.
I was merely pointing out as OTHERS have done… FOLLOW THE MONEY.
Don’t be so blind that because someone is crazy enough to agree with your theory they have your best interest at heart.
I’m sure she’s super smart.
All I’m saying is that I will trust the human virologists and immunologists over a veterinarian when it comes to their specialties.
Much like I would go to a cardiologist for a heart issue instead of a pulmonologist.
IDEALLY, people should be able to go to their own doctor and have him/her prescribe what is best for the situation.
Unfortunately, it's not that simple anymore. The doctor/patient relationship has been destroyed in many cases by bureaucrats, regulations and insurance companies. We are left adrift not knowing who we can trust anymore for medical advice. The insurance companies make decisions based on their bottom line, not what is in the best interest of patients. Doctors, in too many cases, default to what the insurance companies tell them to do.
So, DrJenner, the public's trust in the medical profession is so low now, its becoming normal to distrust what a doctor tells you and assume an ulterior motive. I don't know how this can be rectified. But it is what it is right now.
Unfortunately, it's not that simple anymore. The doctor/patient relationship has been destroyed in many cases by bureaucrats, regulations and insurance companies. We are left adrift not knowing who we can trust anymore for medical advice. The insurance companies make decisions based on their bottom line, not what is in the best interest of patients. Doctors, in too many cases, default to what the insurance companies tell them to do.
So, DrJenner, the public's trust in the medical profession is so low now, its becoming normal to distrust what a doctor tells you and assume an ulterior motive. I don't know how this can be rectified. But it is what it is right now.
That's splitting hairs, it still injects you with spike proteins.
I disagree on it being unbiased, it says a few 100% misleading bits of info that are not true.
Your a medical doctor that's 100% ignorant of the science of Chlorine Dioxide, who instead believes ficticious propaganda. All you have to do is investigate the scientific facts. Once you realize this big lie from the pharmaceutical and medical establishment, you will understand there are many more lies you have been condished to believe.
I'm sure your narsicisom and ego will keep you ignorant.
And you resort to name calling when someone calls you out on your BS.
I looked through that EPA fact sheet you sent me on CDS. It has to do with purification of water, there have not been ANY safety data on it for people, and can actually cause liver failure, something you would know if you actually had a background in science.
https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20210629-south-americas-bitter-divide-over-a-toxic-covid-cure
Chlorine dioxide, the apparent cure they were clamouring for, is not only ineffective against Covid-19, but it can cause life-threatening dehydration and acute liver failure. It is considered hazardous for human consumption by health authorities all over the world, including those in Peru. Its promoters have had face-offs with doctors and have even been prosecuted by authorities for years, but the coronavirus pandemic gave them their biggest showcase so far.
Who is the narcissist with an ego here? Get real.
The doctor/patient relationship has been destroyed in many cases by bureaucrats, regulations and insurance companies. We are left adrift not knowing who we can trust anymore for medical advice. The insurance companies make decisions based on their bottom line, not what is in the best interest of patients. Doctors, in too many cases, default to what the insurance companies tell them to do.
Yes - in the outpatient setting, insurance companies often dictate what patients can or can't be on. This is extremely frustrating, and even happens for us medical people who are getting care. I can tell you most docs/APPs default to insurance companies because the patient won't want (or can't) pay out of pocket for what is really needed.
Medicine has resorted to click boxes - did someone get their colonoscopy, flu shot, blah blah, where you are treating the computer instead of the patient. (This is why I can't stand outpatient medicine). It really needs a total overhaul - and the pandemic has made that glaringly obvious.
We still follow evidence based practice, and while the evidence is still up in the air for ivermectin in the outpatient setting - everything I've read (that is positive) said possible benefit within the first few days of exposure but that's it. Most times people don't know that they've been exposed until its too late to show any benefit.
I don't know how to rectify it either, but these people who aren't listening are coming in sicker and sicker. It's frustrating and will eventually break the system.
Lol, your completely wrong! Your a joke!
Thanks for proving my point once again.
Similar threads
