Video by Dr. Ryan Cole

[DrJenner]

@Danil54grl I finally had a chance to watch the video by Dr. Ryan Cole.

First, I wanted to do some research about him - his career is pretty impressive.
Dr. Ryan Cole has worked around medicine for more than 30 years, according to a resume sent to commissioners in Idaho. He attended the U.S. Air Force Academy before graduating from Brigham Young University in 1993 with a bachelor’s degree in pre-medicine/zoology. He then attended medical school at Virginia Commonwealth University, where he graduated in 1997.
He also was a resident and then a fellow of surgical pathology at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota. His professional career has largely been spent in the Treasure Valley (Idaho). He worked at Saint Alphonsus Regional Medical Center before working as the CEO and medical director of Cole Diagnostics since 2004. He has also worked as a consultant at the Boise Veteran’s Affairs Hospital, a spokesperson for the College of American Pathologists and various other consulting positions.
He has a license to practice medicine in 11 states, according to his resume. He said he’s bilingual in English and Spanish.

Possible conflict of interest:
At the start of the pandemic, his lab ordered thousands of COVID-19 antibody tests, with the goal of seeing how widespread the virus was among those without any visible symptoms.
Some have raised concerns that he’s profiting from testing as he publicly encourages alternative treatments to the vaccine.

Here are some of my low level thoughts in response to his statements:

“Coronaviruses are seasonal. They follow a six-to-nine-month life cycle, and no matter what we do, they’re going to do what they do, and then they’re going to fade. What happened to SARS, what happened to MERS? What did we do to stop them? Nothing, they did their thing.”
Disease seasonality refers to when the number of infections rise at certain times of the year, but are low at other times, and when the pattern repeats itself every year. This pattern is observed in several infectious diseases, including some common coronaviruses, but Cole’s claim seemed to imply that “a six-to-nine-month life cycle” is a rule for all coronaviruses. This is contradicted by the fact that more than a year later, COVID-19 is still actively spreading in several parts of the world, including the US and European countries.
Edridge et al. (2020) Seasonal coronavirus protective immunity is short-lasting. Nature Medicine.
Monto et al. (2020) Coronavirus Occurrence and Transmission Over 8 Years in the HIVE Cohort of Households in Michigan. Journal of Infectious Disease.

It is inaccurate to cite SARS (severe acute respiratory syndrome) and MERS (Middle East respiratory syndrome) as examples of diseases caused by seasonal coronaviruses. Neither of these viruses exhibit seasonal activity. The first outbreak of SARS began in 2003, with a 2nd smaller outbreak occurring in 2004 after researchers studying the SARS coronavirus became infected by accident. No other cases of SARS were recorded after that. If SARS was a seasonal disease, as Cole claimed, new cases would be expected each year.

MERS was first reported in 2002- Researchers studying the pattern of MERS cases between 2015 and 2017 concluded that the disease doesn’t exhibit seasonality, at least in terms of primary infections.
Al-Tawfiq and Memish. (2019) Lack of seasonal variation of Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (MERS-CoV). Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease.

It is also false to claim that nothing was done to stop SARS and MERS. Unlike COVID-19, no community spread of SARS took place in the U.S.. As such, the country didn’t experience widespread cases of SARS. According to the CDC, there were only eight cases of SARS-CoV-1 infection, all of which were linked to travel in areas where SARS was spreading. Given the fact that there was no community spread of SARS, no control measures were imposed on the general public.

This wasn’t the case for regions that saw SARS spread, including China, Singapore, and Hong Kong. All three countries implemented significant control measures to reduce the spread of SARS, such as temperature screenings, contact tracing, school closures, and implementing quarantines of contacts and suspected cases.
Ahmad et al. (2009) Controlling SARS: a review on China’s response compared with other SARS‐affected countries. Tropical Medicine and International Health.

As with SARS, the U.S. didn’t see widespread transmission of MERS. The CDC reported that only two people in the U.S. tested positive for MERS, both in 2014. The global spread of MERS, like SARS, was largely confined to a specific geographic region, namely the Arabian Peninsula. One exception is South Korea, which saw an outbreak in 2014 that was linked to one traveller who visited the Middle East. That outbreak was brought under control thanks to public health measures, including contact tracing and quarantine and isolation of all contacts and suspected cases.

“But if you get a coronavirus shot, historically, SARS, MERS, animal coronaviruses […] when you’re exposed to a wild-type variant of the virus […] months later, the immune system can go haywire. In the SARS vaccine trials in the ferrets and the monkeys, 100% of the animals, when exposed to wild-type virus, ended up with immune reaction.”

This is most likely a reference to the immunological phenomenon known as antibody-mediated enhancement (ADE).

ADE occurs when antibodies bind to a virus in a manner that fails to neutralize a virus’ infectivity, but instead makes it easier for the virus to infect cells. The potential danger posed by ADE is one that scientists developing vaccines are mindful of.

This is due to previous experiences with vaccine candidates for other coronaviruses, such as the virus SARS-CoV-1, which causes SARS, as well as coronaviruses that infect animals. Researchers developed a vaccine candidate for SARS-CoV-1 using inactivated (“killed”) virus, which was tested in mice. They observed that vaccinated mice showed more severe lung disease upon infection with live virus. In the case of another coronavirus, cats that were vaccinated with a recombinant virus vaccine survived for a shorter period of time compared to unvaccinated cats.
Bolles et al. (2011) A Double-Inactivated Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Vaccine Provides Incomplete Protection in Mice and Induces Increased Eosinophilic Proinflammatory Pulmonary Response upon Challenge. Journal of Virology.
Vennema et al. (1990) Early death after feline infectious peritonitis virus challenge due to recombinant vaccinia virus immunization. Journal of Virology.

A vaccine candidate against the respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) also failed human clinical trials, as it caused more severe illness in vaccinated people.
Kim et al. (1969) Respiratory Syncytial Virus Disease in Infants Despite Prior Administration of Antigenic Inactivated Vaccine. American Journal of Epidemiology.

Because these studies highlighted the problem of ADE from vaccines, researchers are aware that this is a potential risk of COVID-19 vaccines that needs to be monitored. The vaccines authorized for emergency use by the FDA are carefully monitored for ADE and other severe side effects.

Clinical trials didn’t show any indication that ADE occurs in people who received the COVID-19 vaccines. Walter Orenstein, a professor at Emory University’s School of Medicine and associate director of the Emory Vaccine Center, stated in this Health Feedback review: “Vaccine-enhanced disease is theoretically possible with SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, but it has not been seen as of yet in the clinical trials reported.”

 

[DrJenner]

COVID-19 vaccines are “experimental biological gene therapy”; “mRNA trials in mammals have led to odd cancers, mRNA trials on mammals have led to autoimmune diseases”

Cole claimed that COVID-19 RNA vaccines are gene therapies. This is false. Gene therapies modify a person’s DNA in order to treat a disease. RNA from a vaccine would not be able to directly alter our DNA, in part because of the chemical differences between the two nucleic acids. RNA also would not persist long enough to cause autoimmunity. Autoimmune diseases are chronic in nature, whereas RNA has a very short lifespan, being quickly degraded after it has been used to make a protein.

Robert Carnahan, an associate professor at Vanderbilt University and associate director of the Vanderbilt Vaccine Center, explained that while “RNA vaccines represent a new innovation, they are based on longstanding foundational scientific principles.” RNA serves as the recipe or blueprint that instructs cells to make a particular protein. After it has served its purpose, “cells in the body have innate mechanisms of degrading this RNA and not allowing it to persist,” he said. Therefore, any RNA injected from a vaccine will not persist long enough to cause autoimmune disorders, which are chronic diseases. A 2017 study published by Science Advances estimated that RNA used as protein blueprints (messenger RNA or mRNA) generally lasted for a mere two minutes in yeast cells. Another study in mice found that mRNA decayed after about three days post-injection. (Note the dates in these studies.
Baudrimont et al. (2017) Multiplexed gene control reveals rapid mRNA turnover. Science Advances.
Probst et al. (2007) Spontaneous cellular uptake of exogenous messenger RNA in vivo is nucleic acid-specific, saturable and ion dependent. Gene Therapy.

Carnahan also pointed out that RNA is chemically different from DNA, making it virtually impossible for RNA to directly integrate into DNA to change a person’s genome.

While concerns over the safety profile of the potential vaccines are natural, given the accelerated vaccine development timeline imposed by the urgency of the COVID-19 pandemic, Sanjay Mishra, a staff scientist and project coordinator at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, explained that RNA vaccines are considered to be extremely safe based on past research. “Safety studies have concluded that there is little concern for integration of DNA into genomes. mRNA vaccines are even safer and advantageous because RNA itself cannot integrate into genomic DNA without the presence of a retrovirus element, such as reverse transcriptase and integrase,” he said. (Again note the dates on this study)
Pardi et al. (2018) mRNA vaccines — a new era in vaccinology. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.
Schlake et al. (2012) Developing mRNA-vaccine technologies. RNA Biology.

Cole’s claim that RNA vaccine trials led to cancer and autoimmune diseases are unsubstantiated, as he didn’t provide any evidence for these claims.

“90% of deaths in the state have been over 70 years of age. That’s the at-risk population. We have stopped our society for something that’s taking people that are already at that death risk age anyway”

This claim overlooks the fact that the outcomes of COVID-19 aren’t limited to either complete recovery or death. While most people who get COVID-19 survive, a certain proportion of survivors struggle with long-term health problems, which researchers termed “long COVID”. Among some of the documented effects are shortness of breath, fatigue, and an inability to focus or think clearly (“brain fog”). These effects can considerably affect a person’s quality of life.

Long COVID affects a wide variety of people, including those who had mild or serious COVID-19, as well as young, athletic, and elderly people. It is also unclear how long it will take for the effects to go away, as Stephanie LaVergne, an infectious disease researcher at Colorado State University, wrote in The Conversation.
https://theconversation.com/how-many-people-get-long-covid-and-who-is-most-at-risk-154331
Cole’s claim that 90% of deaths in Idaho came from those over 70 years of age isn’t accurate.
You can find the current data here:
https://public.tableau.com/app/prof...lic.health/viz/DPHIdahoCOVID-19Dashboard/Home
Even back in April, the deaths over 70 years of age comprised about 80% of deaths, not 90% and the ratio is much less now (taken from the Idaho division of public health).

Chief medical officer at St. Luke’s Hospital James Souza looked at some of Cole’s claims as well; his comments can be seen in this video.

 

[Helen Back]

When do you sleep?

 

[DrJenner]

Lol @Helen Back
Not much these days unfortunately, although the other day I slept in until 8:30 am. It was glorious!

 

[Danil54grl]

Thank you for taking the time to watch and respond.

 

[Proud Prepper]

Thank you for your feedback and one sided spin.

 

[DrJenner]

Thank you for your feedback and one sided spin.

Thank you for your predictable snarky comment.

 

[Dostoyevsky]

RNA from a vaccine would not be able to directly alter our DNA, in part because of the chemical differences between the two nucleic acids. RNA also would not persist long enough to cause autoimmunity. Autoimmune diseases are chronic in nature, whereas RNA has a very short lifespan, being quickly degraded after it has been used to make a protein.

There is evidence that RNA from vaccines can in fact alter DNA. This paper looked at why people can continue to test positive even after the disease was long gone: Reverse-transcribed SARS-CoV-2 RNA can integrate into the genome of cultured human cells and can be expressed in patient-derived tissues

The paper says: 'One possible explanation for the continued detection of SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA in the absence of virus reproduction is that, in some cases, DNA copies of viral subgenomic RNAs may integrate into the DNA of the host cell by a reverse transcription mechanism. Transcription of the integrated DNA copies could be responsible for positive PCR tests long after the initial infection was cleared. Indeed, nonretroviral RNA virus sequences have been detected in the genomes of many vertebrate species (25, 26), with several integrations exhibiting signals consistent with the integration of DNA copies of viral mRNAs into the germline via ancient long interspersed nuclear element (LINE) retrotransposons (reviewed in ref. 27). Furthermore, nonretroviral RNA viruses such as vesicular stomatitis virus or lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV) can be reverse transcribed into DNA copies by an endogenous reverse transcriptase (RT), and DNA copies of the viral sequences have been shown to integrate into the DNA of host cells (28⇓–30).

This isn't proof that RNA from the vaccines does alter DNA, just that it can -- the mechanism exists -- but it is wrong to categorically state that it won't be able to.

As for ADE, you say:

Because these studies highlighted the problem of ADE from vaccines, researchers are aware that this is a potential risk of COVID-19 vaccines that needs to be monitored. The vaccines authorized for emergency use by the FDA are carefully monitored for ADE and other severe side effects.

The papers I've seen all say that ADE (antibody dependent enhancement) hasn't been seen yet. But it's a long-term effect. They're monitoring, and basically hoping for the best. The problem with the monitoring of course is, what do you do if long-term effects like ADE do occur at some stage? You cannot remove the vaccine from your body.

These sort of long-term effects are the reason why vaccines in the past have taken years to be approved. None have ever been approved in a few months and none of these covid vaccines are actually fully approved -- they're approved for emergency use only. The general public are taking part in a vast clinical trial, against their knowledge in most cases.

 

[DrJenner]

There is evidence that RNA from vaccines can in fact alter DNA. This paper looked at why people can continue to test positive even after the disease was long gone: Reverse-transcribed SARS-CoV-2 RNA can integrate into the genome of cultured human cells and can be expressed in patient-derived tissues

The paper says: 'One possible explanation for the continued detection of SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA in the absence of virus reproduction is that, in some cases, DNA copies of viral subgenomic RNAs may integrate into the DNA of the host cell by a reverse transcription mechanism. Transcription of the integrated DNA copies could be responsible for positive PCR tests long after the initial infection was cleared. Indeed, nonretroviral RNA virus sequences have been detected in the genomes of many vertebrate species (25, 26), with several integrations exhibiting signals consistent with the integration of DNA copies of viral mRNAs into the germline via ancient long interspersed nuclear element (LINE) retrotransposons (reviewed in ref. 27). Furthermore, nonretroviral RNA viruses such as vesicular stomatitis virus or lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV) can be reverse transcribed into DNA copies by an endogenous reverse transcriptase (RT), and DNA copies of the viral sequences have been shown to integrate into the DNA of host cells (28⇓–30).

This isn't proof that RNA from the vaccines does alter DNA, just that it can -- the mechanism exists -- but it is wrong to categorically state that it won't be able to.

As for ADE, you say:


The papers I've seen all say that ADE (antibody dependent enhancement) hasn't been seen yet. But it's a long-term effect. They're monitoring, and basically hoping for the best. The problem with the monitoring of course is, what do you do if long-term effects like ADE do occur at some stage? You cannot remove the vaccine from your body.

These sort of long-term effects are the reason why vaccines in the past have taken years to be approved. None have ever been approved in a few months and none of these covid vaccines are actually fully approved -- they're approved for emergency use only. The general public are taking part in a vast clinical trial, against their knowledge in most cases.

Thanks for a thoughtful response.

Very interesting article on the RNA altering DNA. The article you referenced, has to do with the actual SARS-CoV however, not the vaccine itself. So essentially, the RNA of covid19 is integrating due to a presence of a retrovirus element (which is something the vaccine does not contain).

It is worth it to note as per my previous post however:
“Safety studies have concluded that there is little concern for integration of DNA into genomes. mRNA vaccines are even safer and advantageous because RNA itself cannot integrate into genomic DNA without the presence of a retrovirus element, such as reverse transcriptase and integrase,” he said. (Again note the dates on this study)
Pardi et al. (2018) mRNA vaccines — a new era in vaccinology. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.
Schlake et al. (2012) Developing mRNA-vaccine technologies. RNA Biology.

So essentially the virus can alter your DNA, but the vaccine cannot.
I did see this in practice, with PCR tests being positive up to 45 days later! Was definitely a new perplexing phenomenon for us at the time.

As far as ADE, it is what it is - has not been seen yet. With all the vaccines that have been administered, we still have not seen it- where -it would stand to reason we should see something by now.
Again, I'm not a vaccine developer, but what I do know is that the safety profile is being continually monitored.

 

[Proud Prepper]

Thanks for a thoughtful response.

Very interesting article on the RNA altering DNA. The article you referenced, has to do with the actual SARS-CoV however, not the vaccine itself. So essentially, the RNA of covid19 is integrating due to a presence of a retrovirus element (which is something the vaccine does not contain).

It is worth it to note as per my previous post however:
“Safety studies have concluded that there is little concern for integration of DNA into genomes. mRNA vaccines are even safer and advantageous because RNA itself cannot integrate into genomic DNA without the presence of a retrovirus element, such as reverse transcriptase and integrase,” he said. (Again note the dates on this study)
Pardi et al. (2018) mRNA vaccines — a new era in vaccinology. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.
Schlake et al. (2012) Developing mRNA-vaccine technologies. RNA Biology.

So essentially the virus can alter your DNA, but the vaccine cannot.
I did see this in practice, with PCR tests being positive up to 45 days later! Was definitely a new perplexing phenomenon for us at the time.

As far as ADE, it is what it is - has not been seen yet. With all the vaccines that have been administered, we still have not seen it- where -it would stand to reason we should see something by now.
Again, I'm not a vaccine developer, but what I do know is that the safety profile is being continually monitored.

(which is something the vaccine does not contain

so your telling us, you know what's in these covid shots called vaccines? What exactly is in them, please enlighten us.

 

[Proud Prepper]

What Are the Non-Disclosed Ingredients Contained in CoV – 19 So-Called Pfizer, Moderna, Astrazeneca and Janssen Vaccines?
To answer this question an aqueous fraction of the Pfizer, Moderna, Astrazeneca and Janssen vaccines were taken from each vial and then viewed separately under pHase Contrast Microscopy at 100x, 600x up to1500x magnification showing anatomical evidence of reduced Graphene Oxide (rGO) particulates which were compared to micrographs of rGO from Choucair et al, 2009 for identification and verification.[3]
Steps of Analysis of Vaccine Aqueous Fractions
Refrigerated samples were processed under sterile conditions, using laminar flow chamber and sterilized labware.
Steps for analyses were:
1. Dilution in 0.9% sterile physiological saline (0.45 ml + 1.2 ml)
2. Polarity fractionation: 1.2 ml hexane + 120 ul of RD1 sample
3. Extraction of hydrophilic aqueous pHase
4. UV absorbance and fluorescence spectroscopy scanning

5. Extraction and quantification of RNA in the sample
6. Electron and optical microscopy of aqueous pHase
The Pfizer “Vaccine” Non-disclosed Ingredients
The micrographs in Figures 2 and 3 were obtained using 100X, 600X and 1500X pHase Contrast, Dark Field and Bright Field Optical Microscopy.[3]
On the left of each micrograph you will view micrographs obtained from the Pfizer vaccine aqueous fraction containing rGO.
On the right of each micrograph you will view a match from known sources containing rGO for anatomical validation.
The observations under a pHase Contrast, Dark-Field, Bright-Field microscopy, Transmission and Scanning Electron microscopy of the vaccine product by Pfizer, including vaccine products of Moderna, Astrazeneca and Janssen revealed some entities that can be graphene strips

 

[Proud Prepper]

https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/...opy-reveals-graphene-oxide-in-cov-19-vaccines

 

[DrJenner]

https://www.hackensackmeridianhealt...own-of-the-ingredients-in-the-covid-vaccines/
COVID Vaccine Ingredients
There are two COVID-19 messenger-ribonucleic acid (mRNA) vaccines currently authorized for emergent use in the United States: the Pfizer-BioNTech and the Moderna vaccines. A third vaccine developed by Johnson &Johnson (J&J) Janssen uses a viral vector platform. Conventional vaccines, rely on weakened and inactivated pathogens or a fragment of the pathogen to trigger an immune response. In contrast, the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines use a new approach by which mRNA is delivered into our cells to provide the genetic instructions for our own cells to “temporarily” make a “specific” viral protein (the coronavirus spike protein) that triggers an immune response. The J&J COVID-19 vaccine is a type of “replication-incompetent vector vaccine.” This vaccine also contains the genetic instructions to express a stabilized coronavirus spike protein, but instead of mRNA, these instructions are delivered via DNA stored inside a modified vector virus (Adenovirus 26). This adenovirus has been engineered to enter the human cells and deliver the desired genetic information without replicating itself or causing illness. Once inside the cells, the DNA encoding for the coronavirus spike protein can be read by the cell and transcribed into mRNA. At this point, the J&J vaccine acts similarly to the mRNA vaccines.

The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine is made of the following ingredients:

mRNA – Also known as messenger ribonucleic acid, mRNA is the only active ingredient in the vaccine. The mRNA molecules contain the genetic material that provide instructions for our body on how to make a viral protein that triggers an immune response within our bodies. The immune response is what causes our bodies to make the antibodies needed to protect us from getting infected if exposed to the coronavirus.
There are rumors that mRNA vaccines will alter our DNA because the RNA molecule can convert information stored in DNA into proteins. That’s simply, not true. It’s critical to note that the mRNA vaccines never enter the nucleus of the cell, where our DNA is stored. After injection, the mRNA from the vaccine is released into the cytoplasm of the cells. Once the viral protein is made and on the surface of the cell, mRNA is broken down and the body permanently gets rid of it, therefore making it impossible to change our DNA.

Lipids – The following lipids are in the new COVID vaccine. Their main role is to protect the mRNA and provide somewhat of a “greasy” exterior that helps the mRNA slide inside the cells.
((4-hydroxybutyl)azanediyl)bis(hexane-6,1-diyl)bis
(2-hexyldecanoate), 2 [(polyethylene glycol)-2000]-N,N-ditetradecylacetamide
1,2-Distearoyl-snglycero-3- phosphocholine
cholesterol
Salts – The following salts are included in the Pfizer vaccine and help balance the acidity in your body.
potassium chloride
monobasic potassium phosphate
sodium chloride
dibasic sodium phosphate dihydrate
Sugar – Basic table sugar, also known as sucrose, can also be found in the new COVID vaccine. This ingredient helps the molecules maintain their shape during freezing.
The Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine is made of the following ingredients:

mRNA – Like the Pfizer BioNTech vaccine, Moderna’s also uses mRNA technology to build antibodies against COVID-19.
Lipids – The Moderna vaccine also requires lipids to help deliver the mRNA to the cells.
SM-102
1,2-dimyristoyl-rac-glycero3-methoxypolyethylene glycol-2000 [PEG2000-DMG]
cholesterol
1,2-distearoyl-snglycero-3-phosphocholine [DSPC]
The remaining ingredients (below), including acids, acid stabilizers, salt and sugar all work together to maintain the stability of the vaccine after it’s produced.

Acids
Acetic acid
Acid Stabilizers
Tromethamine & Tromethamine hydrochloride
Salts
Sodium acetate
Sugar
Sucrose
The Johnson & Johnson Janssen COVID-19 Vaccine is made of the following ingredients:

Recombinant, replication-incompetent adenovirus type 26 expressing the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein:a modified and harmless version of a different virus (Adenovirus 26) is used as a “vector” to deliverthe DNA gene sequence to produce the coronavirus spike protein. Once the modified adenovirus vaccine enters into the cells, the body of the virus essentially disintegrates and the DNA material within it travels into the nucleus of the human cell where it is transcribed into mRNA. The coronavirus spike protein is then produced and displayed on the cell’s surface, prompting the immune system to begin producing antibodies and activating T-cells to fight off what it thinks is an infection.
The Adenovirus 26 in the J&J vaccine does not replicate, and like the mRNA vaccines, does not change our genetic code.

Acids
citric acid monohydrate
Salts
trisodium citrate dihydrate
Sugars
2-hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin (HBCD)
polysorbate-80, sodium chloride
Other ingredients
ethanol

 

[DrJenner]

https://www.forbes.com/sites/brucel...s-here-are-the-latest-unsupported-claims/amp/
https://www.sciencetimes.com/articl...-mostly-graphene-oxide-heres-what-experts.htm
In an earlier interview with Stew Peters, dated July 5, Dr. Jane Ruby discloses that researchers from the University of Almeria in Spain inspected vials of Pfizer vaccines and reported finding graphene oxide composing more than 99.9 percent of the material.

However, the official fact sheet available on the US Food and Drug Administration website- which contains relevant data such as the ingredient list - for the Pfizer and BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine makes no mention of the graphene oxide anywhere in the document. Similarly, the Associated Press (AP) released a statement calling the claim false, citing Pfizer senior manager of science media relations Kit Longley. The international journalism entity also gathered opinions from various medical experts such as MIT chemical engineering professor Allen Myerson or Johns Hopkins infectious disease specialist Dr. Amesh Adalja.

Additionally, the AP secured a response from the University of Almeria, which denied involvement in the supposed exposé. In its own statement, originally in Spanish, the University expressed support for COVID-19 vaccines and disavowed the results from the study of one of its professors. Also, the report, which is not yet peer-reviewed and not officially published, includes a disclaimer that the findings do not represent any institutional position for the University.

Bruce Y. Lee, Professor of Health Policy and Management at the City University of New York (CUNY) School of Public Health, writes in his July 10 column that "the word 'medical expert' is not something that you can just throw out there." He also links readers to Dr. Jane Ruby's website and calls into question Dr. Ruby's credentials.

 

[Proud Prepper]

https://www.hackensackmeridianhealt...own-of-the-ingredients-in-the-covid-vaccines/
COVID Vaccine Ingredients
There are two COVID-19 messenger-ribonucleic acid (mRNA) vaccines currently authorized for emergent use in the United States: the Pfizer-BioNTech and the Moderna vaccines. A third vaccine developed by Johnson &Johnson (J&J) Janssen uses a viral vector platform. Conventional vaccines, rely on weakened and inactivated pathogens or a fragment of the pathogen to trigger an immune response. In contrast, the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines use a new approach by which mRNA is delivered into our cells to provide the genetic instructions for our own cells to “temporarily” make a “specific” viral protein (the coronavirus spike protein) that triggers an immune response. The J&J COVID-19 vaccine is a type of “replication-incompetent vector vaccine.” This vaccine also contains the genetic instructions to express a stabilized coronavirus spike protein, but instead of mRNA, these instructions are delivered via DNA stored inside a modified vector virus (Adenovirus 26). This adenovirus has been engineered to enter the human cells and deliver the desired genetic information without replicating itself or causing illness. Once inside the cells, the DNA encoding for the coronavirus spike protein can be read by the cell and transcribed into mRNA. At this point, the J&J vaccine acts similarly to the mRNA vaccines.

The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine is made of the following ingredients:

mRNA – Also known as messenger ribonucleic acid, mRNA is the only active ingredient in the vaccine. The mRNA molecules contain the genetic material that provide instructions for our body on how to make a viral protein that triggers an immune response within our bodies. The immune response is what causes our bodies to make the antibodies needed to protect us from getting infected if exposed to the coronavirus.
There are rumors that mRNA vaccines will alter our DNA because the RNA molecule can convert information stored in DNA into proteins. That’s simply, not true. It’s critical to note that the mRNA vaccines never enter the nucleus of the cell, where our DNA is stored. After injection, the mRNA from the vaccine is released into the cytoplasm of the cells. Once the viral protein is made and on the surface of the cell, mRNA is broken down and the body permanently gets rid of it, therefore making it impossible to change our DNA.

Lipids – The following lipids are in the new COVID vaccine. Their main role is to protect the mRNA and provide somewhat of a “greasy” exterior that helps the mRNA slide inside the cells.
((4-hydroxybutyl)azanediyl)bis(hexane-6,1-diyl)bis
(2-hexyldecanoate), 2 [(polyethylene glycol)-2000]-N,N-ditetradecylacetamide
1,2-Distearoyl-snglycero-3- phosphocholine
cholesterol
Salts – The following salts are included in the Pfizer vaccine and help balance the acidity in your body.
potassium chloride
monobasic potassium phosphate
sodium chloride
dibasic sodium phosphate dihydrate
Sugar – Basic table sugar, also known as sucrose, can also be found in the new COVID vaccine. This ingredient helps the molecules maintain their shape during freezing.
The Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine is made of the following ingredients:

mRNA – Like the Pfizer BioNTech vaccine, Moderna’s also uses mRNA technology to build antibodies against COVID-19.
Lipids – The Moderna vaccine also requires lipids to help deliver the mRNA to the cells.
SM-102
1,2-dimyristoyl-rac-glycero3-methoxypolyethylene glycol-2000 [PEG2000-DMG]
cholesterol
1,2-distearoyl-snglycero-3-phosphocholine [DSPC]
The remaining ingredients (below), including acids, acid stabilizers, salt and sugar all work together to maintain the stability of the vaccine after it’s produced.

Acids
Acetic acid
Acid Stabilizers
Tromethamine & Tromethamine hydrochloride
Salts
Sodium acetate
Sugar
Sucrose
The Johnson & Johnson Janssen COVID-19 Vaccine is made of the following ingredients:

Recombinant, replication-incompetent adenovirus type 26 expressing the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein:a modified and harmless version of a different virus (Adenovirus 26) is used as a “vector” to deliverthe DNA gene sequence to produce the coronavirus spike protein. Once the modified adenovirus vaccine enters into the cells, the body of the virus essentially disintegrates and the DNA material within it travels into the nucleus of the human cell where it is transcribed into mRNA. The coronavirus spike protein is then produced and displayed on the cell’s surface, prompting the immune system to begin producing antibodies and activating T-cells to fight off what it thinks is an infection.
The Adenovirus 26 in the J&J vaccine does not replicate, and like the mRNA vaccines, does not change our genetic code.

Acids
citric acid monohydrate
Salts
trisodium citrate dihydrate
Sugars
2-hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin (HBCD)
polysorbate-80, sodium chloride
Other ingredients
ethanol

So you don't know. I've read the same claimed information published by Big Pharma. I'm more interested in independent labs analysis.

 

[Proud Prepper]

https://www.forbes.com/sites/brucel...s-here-are-the-latest-unsupported-claims/amp/
https://www.sciencetimes.com/articl...-mostly-graphene-oxide-heres-what-experts.htm
In an earlier interview with Stew Peters, dated July 5, Dr. Jane Ruby discloses that researchers from the University of Almeria in Spain inspected vials of Pfizer vaccines and reported finding graphene oxide composing more than 99.9 percent of the material.

However, the official fact sheet available on the US Food and Drug Administration website- which contains relevant data such as the ingredient list - for the Pfizer and BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine makes no mention of the graphene oxide anywhere in the document. Similarly, the Associated Press (AP) released a statement calling the claim false, citing Pfizer senior manager of science media relations Kit Longley. The international journalism entity also gathered opinions from various medical experts such as MIT chemical engineering professor Allen Myerson or Johns Hopkins infectious disease specialist Dr. Amesh Adalja.

Additionally, the AP secured a response from the University of Almeria, which denied involvement in the supposed exposé. In its own statement, originally in Spanish, the University expressed support for COVID-19 vaccines and disavowed the results from the study of one of its professors. Also, the report, which is not yet peer-reviewed and not officially published, includes a disclaimer that the findings do not represent any institutional position for the University.

Bruce Y. Lee, Professor of Health Policy and Management at the City University of New York (CUNY) School of Public Health, writes in his July 10 column that "the word 'medical expert' is not something that you can just throw out there." He also links readers to Dr. Jane Ruby's website and calls into question Dr. Ruby's credentials.

I don't believe people who are aligned with known liars who's primary rule of there politics is "the ends justify the means" in which to gain power and control.

 

[DrJenner]

So you don't know. I've read the same claimed information published by Big Pharma. I'm more interested in independent labs analysis.

Guess you didn’t read this part:
“ The international journalism entity also gathered opinions from various medical experts such as MIT chemical engineering professor Allen Myerson or Johns Hopkins infectious disease specialist Dr. Amesh Adalja.”

 

[DrJenner]

I don't believe people who are aligned with known liars who's primary rule of there politics is "the ends justify the means" in which to gain power and control.

Here you go.
Independent review by several entities in the UK.
Not like it will make a difference you already have your mind made up anyway.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41541-021-00368-7

 

[Proud Prepper]

Guess you didn’t read this part:
“ The international journalism entity also gathered opinions from various medical experts such as MIT chemical engineering professor Allen Myerson or Johns Hopkins infectious disease specialist Dr. Amesh Adalja.”

I did, which is why I said I'm interested in an independent lab analysis of these shots and do not trust these professors and doctors that get grants from Big pharma and are aligned with dirtbags.

 

[Proud Prepper]

Here you go.
Independent review by several entities in the UK.
Not like it will make a difference you already have your mind made up anyway.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41541-021-00368-7

My bad, I must be a complete idiot. That article clears up everything and supports full transparency of these vaccines. I'm am truely educated and now know exactly what's in these vaccines and why its all in there.

"Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed for this Perspective".