I found what she said easily with a quick search, as you did not specify what you were referring to, so the incident IS on mainstream media. If not, I would not have been able to know what you were talking about. While I said it is not a great moment, one interpretation is that she was trying to embarrass the host who made the error. I find that credible. And that is based on the sources that mentioned it...now, on trump, he called Hispanics drug dealing rapists. He attacked the gold star family ... Ghazala Khan, attacking him and saying he didn’t allow his wife to speak. He attacked a judge, Gonzalo Curiel, saying he could not be fair because he was Mexican. He was sued two times for refusing to rent to Black people. He has said that he did not want Blacks counting his money, only Jewish men (which is racist on two points), and also that Blacks are lazy, but that this is an intrinsic racial characteristic ...according to a former Trump president of his casino named O’Donnell. Then there was the infamous birther conspiracy, where he kept implying that his birth certificate was not accurate. Here is another time he supported violence against a Black man... “At a November campaign rally in Alabama, Trump supporters physically attacked an African-American protester after the man began chanting “Black lives matter.” Video of the incident shows the assailants kicking the man after he has already fallen to the ground.Doreena,
I'm sure there are a few democrats who have a few bits of evidence to support their 'facts'. But that's the rare exception, and from many things you've written here, you're not one of them.
My first example. How on earth can you really say what Hillary said was "making a poor joke"? Had Trump said the exact same thing in the exact same conversation, every media outlet for the next 28 days would be calling him a racist & demanding immediate resignation. But, please, Doreena, prove me wrong. Take your best shot at explaining how that comment was not blatantly racist. And explain why all of the MSM didn't even mention it. Please provide evidence to support your 'fact' that it was just a poor joke. And more evidence (#2), please quote times when Trump said anything even close to that in the past 20 years.
And let me give you a third shot at this. You said you never heard HRC incite violence. Just the other day she said they would not be civil until they win. How else can that be interpreted? What, 'not civil' means they don't pass the salt & pepper?
For the minister crazy lady, who said anything about being 'perfect'? Being a decent human being is all we ask, and a minister knows how to hold things together in stressful situations. Caring for people does not include going crazy. So, with that I showed your fourth evidence-free fact regarding her inexcusable behavior. This is your 4th chance, present some real evidence to excuse the inexcusable behavior.
There are 4 examples where you've presented evidence-free 'facts' in a single post. Please prove me wrong.
Post-edit: My apologies if this seems rude. I don't mean it as an insult. But I respect truth. Facts, real facts, facts that have evidence that validates them. And the modern democrat party is completely lacking truth. That is where my anger is directed, not really at Doreena. You're just a victim of their deception, which makes you party to the crime sadly.
The following day, Trump implied that the attackers were justified.
“Maybe [the protester] should have been roughed up,” he mused. “It was absolutely disgusting what he was doing.” Plus, he said that protesting white supremacists were fine people.
Not being civil can mean vocal protests of dissent. I do not see HRC slugging someone nor physically assaulting anyone.
I am only interpreting the minister’s behavior by what she said. I can’t prove or disprove her mindset, but anyone in despair could act as she did. I have been there.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk