OROURKE,,if elected he's coming for them

[grayghost668]

he is wanting to impose a mandatory buy back of the AR15 the AKs and most likely the SKS,,,,this is one BASTARD that needs to be stopped,,,,,,,the sad thing is yes we can put Trump back in office but what do we do after that


https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...ing-to-take-your-ar-15s/ar-AAHd7hK?li=BBnb7Kz

 

[grayghost668]

he was the first thing I saw this morning on the news,,,,,,,,,,,,,he was practically foaming at the mouth about this

 

[TexasFreedom]

Typical leftie moron. He'd do great running in Venezuela. He probably believes couches and bacon make people fat. Don't blame the person that chooses, blame the item chosen. No such thing as personal accountability any more.

While we can laugh at this idiot, more and more people are believing this dribble.

 

[Robinjopo1]

And the audience went wild. Idiots

 

[grayghost668]

Typical leftie moron. He'd do great running in Venezuela. He probably believes couches and bacon make people fat. Don't blame the person that chooses, blame the item chosen. No such thing as personal accountability any more.

While we can laugh at this idiot, more and more people are believing this dribble.

the thing is I am not laughing,,,if the Democrats win the 2nd amendment will be abolished

 

[Robinjopo1]

Thats when the trouble starts.

I hate to say it, but there would be Civil War. I have trouble believing that our military wouldn't have problems with the order to confiscate.

 

[TexasFreedom]

Let's see how New Zealand works out. They have a mandatory turn-in law now, and I doubt most people have done it. Wasn't there a state in the northeast that banned AR's & such, and nobody has turned them in yet? Police aren't looking for them. Call it the 'don't ask / don't tell' version for guns?

 

[Proud Prepper1]

You can simply ignore an unconstitutional law.

 

[tmttactical]

You can simply ignore an unconstitutional law.

I plan to ignore it. Until the 2nd. is repealed (not too likely for a while -- the process is lengthy) it is unconstitutional.

 

[Silent Earth]

Time to buy water proof cache containers for long arms

 

[Robinjopo1]

Give them an inch and............

As Barney Fife says "nip it in the bud"

 

[Gazrok]

No worries. Biden is their guy. So it's all a moot point

 

[KateMTx]

So now someone finally stated the plan in plain English. Mandatory gun buy-back or the take them by force? I can see why Texans didn't vote for Beto. "Come and Take It"

 

[Silent Earth]

I see some US commentators are saying O'rourke is likely to be the trigger for Secession by some states

 

[grayghost668]

well when it comes to taking my guns,,,,,,,,,,,good luck finding them

 

[Silent Earth]

You can simply ignore an unconstitutional law.

Slow learner, you need to realise that Socialists only think the law applies to other lesser beings.

 

[grayghost668]

I see some US commentators are saying O'rourke is likely to be the trigger for Secession by some states

let them go,,,,California will find out real fast that they need US a whole lot more than we need them

 

[Robinjopo1]

No worries. Biden is their guy. So it's all a moot point

Hey Gaz. Hope you are good?

 

[Mountain trapper]

let them go,,,,California will find out real fast that they need US a whole lot more than we need them

But, but, where are we going to get our avocados? And our salmonella covered lettuce?

 

[grayghost668]

I just found this little tidbit ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/fact...fiscate-assault-weapons/ar-AAHidgT?li=BBnb7Kz

 

[Robinjopo1]

So now someone finally stated the plan in plain English. Mandatory gun buy-back or the take them by force? I can see why Texans didn't vote for Beto. "Come and Take It"

How can you buy back something you never owned?

 

[TexasFreedom]

You can simply ignore an unconstitutional law.

That's a dangerous statement. Obamacare was unconstitutional, yet the IRS went after millions who ignored it. Play at your own risk here. Not that I disagree, but it's nothing 'simple'.

 

[Robinjopo1]

Trying to remember somethin gn I read. I may have it wrong.

It was something about how many gun owners we have vs. the number of military and Leo's.

As I mentioned before, many of those will not be eager to confiscate.

 

[Mountain trapper]

Trying to remember somethin gn I read. I may have it wrong.

It was something about how many gun owners we have vs. the number of military and Leo's.

As I mentioned before, many of those will not be eager to confiscate.

They WILL follow orders. A handful may quit, but very few will give up their cushy benefits and pensions. They will not be our friends.

 

[TexasFreedom]

AD, I think a few will do it. Very few. Most will ignore it unless you're waving it in their face. By profession, police officers might be one of the largest owners of AR15's & AK47s! They'd hate to be hypocrites, and you know they're not going to be turning their own in either.

 

[tmttactical]

AD, I think a few will do it. Very few. Most will ignore it unless you're waving it in their face. By profession, police officers might be one of the largest owners of AR15's & AK47s! They'd hate to be hypocrites, and you know they're not going to be turning their own in either.

The police are always excluded from the effects of these laws. I do think many will follow orders. Most will not actively hunt for these"assault" rifles but if ordered to somebodies home to search, yep, they will be there. They have families to support too.

 

[KateMTx]

How can you buy back something you never owned?

That is an excellent point. "Buy back" is a complete misnomer. It pretty much assumes that the government is the rightful owner of everything and anything a citizen possesses they do so by the grace of the government. . . last time I checked this isn't medieval England. A better term might be compensated theft.

 

[grayghost668]

and just when has any buy back program given the owner back the cash they paid for their gun,,,let me save you the trouble of looking,,,NEVER,,,I have never heard of one that gave more than $150.00 for guns,,,,,so this would be simple theft

 

[Mountain trapper]

AD, I think a few will do it. Very few. Most will ignore it unless you're waving it in their face. By profession, police officers might be one of the largest owners of AR15's & AK47s! They'd hate to be hypocrites, and you know they're not going to be turning their own in either.

Sorry Tex but I disagree. Not all police Chiefs are supporters of the second amendment, any more than all county sheriff's are second amendment supporters. The rank and file probably wouldn't turn in their guns but they will follow orders from their superiors. Like I said before; they won't put their pensions and benefits at risk over a law just because they may not agree with it. The little people simply aren't important enough for the cops to risk their retirement over. If they are ordered to start confiscating firearms, they will follow orders and confiscate your firearms.

 

[Proud Prepper1]

Sorry Tex but I disagree. Not all police Chiefs are supporters of the second amendment, any more than all county sheriff's are second amendment supporters. The rank and file probably wouldn't turn in their guns but they will follow orders from their superiors. Like I said before; they won't put their pensions and benefits at risk over a law just because they may not agree with it. The little people simply aren't important enough for the cops to risk their retirement over. If they are ordered to start confiscating firearms, they will follow orders and confiscate your firearms.

Do you think it would be worth risking there life over obeying an unconstitutional order?