GLOBAL GOV’T ALERT: Threat to national sovereignty

Doomsday Prepper Forums

Help Support Doomsday Prepper Forums:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Danil54grl

Top Poster
Joined
Dec 29, 2012
Messages
14,922
Reaction score
54,699
Location
Texas
I didn’t copy the entire article and encourage everyone read it. Scary stuff could happen in a very short time frame leading to a one world government.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...ignty-set-go-may-22-28-world-health-assembly/



Roguski set up the website DontYouDare.info to document the drive to establish this one-world health treaty. The following points are his summary of the draft treaty amendments:


  • The International Health Regulations would be legally binding and supersede the United States Constitution.
  • The United States has proposed amendments to the legally binding International Health Regulations that will be voted upon at the next World Health Assembly May 22 to May 28. CLICK HERE FOR OFFICIAL DOCUMENT
  • These proposed amendments will cede additional sovereignty, control and legal authority over to the World Health Organization.
  • These amendments will NOT require approval by 2/3 of the United States Senate. If they are approved (as submitted by the United States) by a simple majority of the 194 member countries of the World Health Assembly countries), these amendments would enter into force as international law just six months later (November 2022). The details of this are not crystal clear.
  • It is not known if the amendments will be voted upon individually or as a complete package.
  • The amendments will give the director general of the WHO the power to unilaterally declare a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) even over the objection of the country dealing with an outbreak of disease.
  • According to changes made to U.S. regulations that were published one day before Donald Trump was inaugurated (January 19, 2017), the definition of a “Public Health Emergency” in the United States now includes the declaration of a PHEIC by the WHO.
  • A unilateral declaration of a PHEIC by the WHO will enable the declaration of a Public Health Emergency by the U.S. Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services.
  • The amendments proposed by the United States would also give the director general of the WHO the legal authority to unilaterally issue an “intermediate public health alert (IPHA).” The criteria for the issuance of an IPHA is simply that “the Director-General has determined it requires heightened international awareness and a potential international public health response.”
  • The amendments will also give “regional directors” within the WHO having the legal authority to declare a Public Health Emergency of Regional Concern (PHERC).
Once you take away national sovereignty and start holding America up against a global standard, that opens up endless opportunities for the elites running the global system to confiscate whatever they believe is “bad for our health.”

What if the WHO decides we all need jabs and digital passports? Wait a minute, the WHO has already decided that! All it lacks is the power to override national governments.

This treaty could also be used to take away Americans’ First and Second Amendment rights. What about the Bible? Is it a matter of your religious faith or is it a tool for “hate speech?” Guns, the Bible and too much free speech are bad for our collective “health” and therefore must be regulated by the WHO.
 
As it looks, the WHO will get away with it and we will be really screwed.
I heard that Russia rejected these plans a few weeks ago and let the WHO know that the country will never participate.
Here in Europe, well, the politicians have said nothing, 99% of the population do not know what it is about, the politicians are quiet and vote here 100% for it.

Either way, it's run, either the WHO, Gates and Klaus Schwab wins and we are then their (vaccination) slaves or we rebel against this dictatorship.
 
I don't know what the WHO is thinking. That would be a treaty here in the US and have to be ratified by Congress. After the way the WHO has peed on their own boots over Covid, nobody is going to take them seriously.
 
I didn’t copy the entire article and encourage everyone read it. Scary stuff could happen in a very short time frame leading to a one world government.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...ignty-set-go-may-22-28-world-health-assembly/



Roguski set up the website DontYouDare.info to document the drive to establish this one-world health treaty. The following points are his summary of the draft treaty amendments:


  • The International Health Regulations would be legally binding and supersede the United States Constitution.
  • The United States has proposed amendments to the legally binding International Health Regulations that will be voted upon at the next World Health Assembly May 22 to May 28. CLICK HERE FOR OFFICIAL DOCUMENT
  • These proposed amendments will cede additional sovereignty, control and legal authority over to the World Health Organization.
  • These amendments will NOT require approval by 2/3 of the United States Senate. If they are approved (as submitted by the United States) by a simple majority of the 194 member countries of the World Health Assembly countries), these amendments would enter into force as international law just six months later (November 2022). The details of this are not crystal clear.
  • It is not known if the amendments will be voted upon individually or as a complete package.
  • The amendments will give the director general of the WHO the power to unilaterally declare a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) even over the objection of the country dealing with an outbreak of disease.
  • According to changes made to U.S. regulations that were published one day before Donald Trump was inaugurated (January 19, 2017), the definition of a “Public Health Emergency” in the United States now includes the declaration of a PHEIC by the WHO.
  • A unilateral declaration of a PHEIC by the WHO will enable the declaration of a Public Health Emergency by the U.S. Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services.
  • The amendments proposed by the United States would also give the director general of the WHO the legal authority to unilaterally issue an “intermediate public health alert (IPHA).” The criteria for the issuance of an IPHA is simply that “the Director-General has determined it requires heightened international awareness and a potential international public health response.”
  • The amendments will also give “regional directors” within the WHO having the legal authority to declare a Public Health Emergency of Regional Concern (PHERC).
Once you take away national sovereignty and start holding America up against a global standard, that opens up endless opportunities for the elites running the global system to confiscate whatever they believe is “bad for our health.”

What if the WHO decides we all need jabs and digital passports? Wait a minute, the WHO has already decided that! All it lacks is the power to override national governments.

This treaty could also be used to take away Americans’ First and Second Amendment rights. What about the Bible? Is it a matter of your religious faith or is it a tool for “hate speech?” Guns, the Bible and too much free speech are bad for our collective “health” and therefore must be regulated by the WHO.

Sounds like the NAZIS to me!!!
 
Biden is set to sign on Feb 28th. . . Speak up and speak LOUD to your REPRESENTATIVES!! Tied into Global Digital Passport and ID System. Think the majority of people will not like it at all if they knew what Biden was actually planning. Has this even been spoken about during his press releases? What happens when there is another pandemic though? Would people be swayed? I remember reading about a new pandemic around the corner, just can't remember the name. . . "Mar" something a rather. Supposedly kills 90% of the ones infected. This is against our Constitution and should NEVER happen.

https://brownstone.org/articles/who-treaty-tied-to-digital-passport-id-system/
 
Biden is set to sign on Feb 28th. . . Speak up and speak LOUD to your REPRESENTATIVES!! Tied into Global Digital Passport and ID System. Think the majority of people will not like it at all if they knew what Biden was actually planning. Has this even been spoken about during his press releases? What happens when there is another pandemic though? Would people be swayed? I remember reading about a new pandemic around the corner, just can't remember the name. . . "Mar" something a rather. Supposedly kills 90% of the ones infected. This is against our Constitution and should NEVER happen.

https://brownstone.org/articles/who-treaty-tied-to-digital-passport-id-system/
Everything about the last scamdemic was against our constitution and Bill of Rights. But yet they shoved these Marxist rules down our throats anyway. Look at how many fools fell for it and lined up to get the poison shot. Many of the spineless fools who took the shot, supposedly against their will, would love to see those of us who stood up against it, be forced to get vaccinated.
There doesn't seem to be anything that Biden can do that will get his arse impeached. I don't trust our Repubic representatives to push back much.
The best we can hope for is it will be tied up in court.
 
Everything about the last scamdemic was against our constitution and Bill of Rights. But yet they shoved these Marxist rules down our throats anyway. Look at how many fools fell for it and lined up to get the poison shot. Many of the spineless fools who took the shot, supposedly against their will, would love to see those of us who stood up against it, be forced to get vaccinated.
There doesn't seem to be anything that Biden can do that will get his arse impeached. I don't trust our Repubic representatives to push back much.
The best we can hope for is it will be tied up in court.
With all the shedding happening, it may not matter if we stood up against taking the vaxx. Unvaxxed are having the same blood results. Everyone needs to detox from this crap.. It really is some scary stuff.


https://www.brighteon.com/b91cb526-4a3f-42c3-b74f-54cfe5c84e17
 
Ex-WHO Official Raises Alarm over Global Pandemic Treaty

This includes caving to the WHO on treatments, lockdowns, vaccine mandates, and government surveillance.

Under the treaty, the WHO would have the power to lock the public in their homes or censor the American people in violation of their First Amendment rights, overriding the Constitution.

Even more chillingly, the White House wants to bypass submitting this agreement for Senate approval.

The Biden admin argues that it is not an official treaty despite it having the full force of one.

In a seminal discussion before the Pandemic Response and Recovery All-Party Parliamentary Group (APPG) in the UK, leading health experts raised serious concerns over the WHO’s new powers.

Dr. David Bell, a former WHO senior medical officer, and Professor Garrett Wallace Brown, who chairs Global Health Policy at the University of Leeds, raised the alarm over the sweeping new powers that the WHO will be granted.

They outlined how the proposals could reshape the dynamics between the WHO and its member nations and imperil critical health initiatives.

The contentious point revolves around the unprecedented authority these proposals could vest in the WHO.

According to Dr. Bell, the WHO could wield the power to demand hefty financial contributions from countries, suppress scientific discourse, and enforce travel restrictions, lockdowns, and compulsory vaccinations in response to health emergencies, which the body can declare at its discretion.

Bell explained the transformation of the WHO since its inception in 1946.

indicative of political, rather than scientific, decision-making.

Stringer stressed that the potential impact on public health, democracy, civil liberties, and individual rights necessitates rigorous debate and transparent review.

Both experts and parliamentarians conveyed the urgent need for caution and thorough analysis of the WHO’s proposed changes, calling for countries to retain autonomy in addressing public health challenges, and for the protection of global health initiatives from undue influence.
 
Ex-WHO Official Raises Alarm over Global Pandemic Treaty

This includes caving to the WHO on treatments, lockdowns, vaccine mandates, and government surveillance.

Under the treaty, the WHO would have the power to lock the public in their homes or censor the American people in violation of their First Amendment rights, overriding the Constitution.

Even more chillingly, the White House wants to bypass submitting this agreement for Senate approval.

The Biden admin argues that it is not an official treaty despite it having the full force of one.

In a seminal discussion before the Pandemic Response and Recovery All-Party Parliamentary Group (APPG) in the UK, leading health experts raised serious concerns over the WHO’s new powers.

Dr. David Bell, a former WHO senior medical officer, and Professor Garrett Wallace Brown, who chairs Global Health Policy at the University of Leeds, raised the alarm over the sweeping new powers that the WHO will be granted.

They outlined how the proposals could reshape the dynamics between the WHO and its member nations and imperil critical health initiatives.

The contentious point revolves around the unprecedented authority these proposals could vest in the WHO.

According to Dr. Bell, the WHO could wield the power to demand hefty financial contributions from countries, suppress scientific discourse, and enforce travel restrictions, lockdowns, and compulsory vaccinations in response to health emergencies, which the body can declare at its discretion.

Bell explained the transformation of the WHO since its inception in 1946.

indicative of political, rather than scientific, decision-making.

Stringer stressed that the potential impact on public health, democracy, civil liberties, and individual rights necessitates rigorous debate and transparent review.

Both experts and parliamentarians conveyed the urgent need for caution and thorough analysis of the WHO’s proposed changes, calling for countries to retain autonomy in addressing public health challenges, and for the protection of global health initiatives from undue influence.

It doesn't override the Constitution. Ignore it or comply with it. It's each person's choice. If they try to enforce it against your will, that's what your 2nd amendment right is for.
 
I will not be locked down in my house either, we have chickens , cows and a garden to tend .
i would lock down my property and anyone visiting unexpectedly would get a big welcome party.
I hope they think better of trying to come at night too.
HEY AC, they havent messed with these SC boys yet!!! THEY would regret it!
 

Latest posts

Back
Top