Maverick
Top Poster
- Joined
- Mar 8, 2013
- Messages
- 10,652
- Reaction score
- 26,523
though two different situation
In almost all cases, radioactivity blowing across the world would deteriorate enough in two weeks to be safe to go outside given the half-life of radiation, the problem with fukushima is that the core is still producing iodine-131 unlike nuclear weapons once exploded the deterioration process begins thus nuclear power plants are more dangerous because it continues to keep producing. I am more concern about the high doses of iodine-131 300 mile out from japan then the debris that wash up on our shores the half life of iodine-131 is 8 days it takes longer for debris to float in from japan then 8 days. Our geiger counter hasn't chirped once, my son took it to the coast been no problems there.
And when the Silos have launched and the wind from the now destroyed target starts to blow back , eg like Fukushima is blowing crap over the US west coast?
In almost all cases, radioactivity blowing across the world would deteriorate enough in two weeks to be safe to go outside given the half-life of radiation, the problem with fukushima is that the core is still producing iodine-131 unlike nuclear weapons once exploded the deterioration process begins thus nuclear power plants are more dangerous because it continues to keep producing. I am more concern about the high doses of iodine-131 300 mile out from japan then the debris that wash up on our shores the half life of iodine-131 is 8 days it takes longer for debris to float in from japan then 8 days. Our geiger counter hasn't chirped once, my son took it to the coast been no problems there.