Jack Posobiec ✝ (@JackPosobiec) Tweeted:
God bless Polska
Wow! Maybe some progress for FREEDOM in Aussie Land!
God bless Polska
Wow! Maybe some progress for FREEDOM in Aussie Land!
We can always rely on the Poles to dish it out and tell it as it is. They sadly had nearly 50 yrs of communist occupation to reflect uponJack Posobiec ✝ (@JackPosobiec) Tweeted:
God bless Polska
Wow! Maybe some progress for FREEDOM in Aussie Land!
So not one mention of firearms?Out of curiosity, I looked to see if Australia had a Bill of Rights.
OMG, I was gobsmacked!
It looks like it was written by ACLU lawyers!
So not one mention of firearms?
What "Bill of Rights" are you referring to?Out of curiosity, I looked to see if Australia had a Bill of Rights.
OMG, I was gobsmacked!
It looks like it was written by ACLU lawyers!
The victors get to write the history books.I haven’t heard too many bad things about President Lincoln.
I guess the opinions on President Lincoln vary.especially over a warring divided nation at the time. Father Charles Chiniqy spent quite a few occasions with President Lincoln in person and through letters during and before Abraham Lincolns presidency. He testifies strongly of the truthfulness of the president along with the weight of the civil war he had to bear. He confided in Father Chiniquy that hidden enemies did abound that were seeking out his life. Yes he was unliked especially with a nation divided in a civil war. But what of noble men like general Lee and many other Confederate heroes that have had their statutes taken down because they are not liked by some who find them politically incorrect and racially divisive of which they were not. And that had been happening long before BLM started tearing statues down.. You may find Father Chiniqiquys testimony of Abraham Lincoln most interesting.The victors get to write the history books.
He was an extremely unpopular President before, and during the early part of the war, even in the north.
I’m sure your right the nation would have healed much quicker under president Lincoln. As to reconstruction I thought it was deconstruction that the North showered upon the South with the South never fully recovering until the turn of the 20th century lots of concentration camps the North did introduce. The first nation to do so even before the boar wars. As to the Victors always writing the history I would disagree. While we still have independent publications and free press as much as that is now being hindered more and more with each passing year. Then we still have a multitude of sources to call upon to seek out truth even if they take awhile to surface. Legally the Southern states had every right to secede. The matter of fort Sumter was that the union was supposed to vacate all such forts in confederate territory. The reason for Fort Sumter being attacked was exactly that the union weren’t leaving anytime soon. Quite the opposite they had ship loads of soldiers and supplies already sailing in transit to reinforce fort Sumter. The reality being that the Union never had any intentions of ever letting the South go. Was the issue really about slavery or the rich and powerful northern industrialists wanting to destroy the power of the South. As it seems that Slavery was really on the way out. Just a matter of when. There be so many political intrigues to look into when it comes to researching both the North or the South.I do believe that if Lincoln hadn't been assassinated, things would have gone much better for the South and we might have avoided the disastrous results of Reconstruction.
Remember what I said - "The victors get to write the history books."
What do you know about Lincoln that you didn't read in a book? Most likely a history book.
Lincoln achieved sainthood by being martyred.
If they haven't all been burned, archives of what northern newspapers were editorializing about Lincoln (before they got shut down for so doing) might give some balance to what is in the history books. Political dissent was dealt with harshly.
Rioters in New York City in 1863, fighting Union soldiers
War is almost always about money, power and resources.Thought it was more about state's rights, and the federal govt being overbearing. Slavery being secondary
I doubt it.I’m sure your right the nation would have healed much quicker under president Lincoln.
You doubt it. Why ? Surely the retribution from the Union would not have been as harsh if President Lincoln had lived and not been assassinated.I doubt it.
My perspective is an opinion, just as yours is.You doubt it. Why ? Surely the retribution from the Union would not have been as harsh if President Lincoln had lived and not been assassinated.
Enter your email address to join: