To vacc or not to vacc?

Doomsday Prepper Forums

Help Support Doomsday Prepper Forums:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
I know a young lady who had a baby and in 11 days it has had 4 surgeries. The last one really caught my attention. They had to cut the arteries on both sides of his neck because they were filled with blood clots.

I was really wanting to ask if the mom had been vaccinated and especially if she had one while pregnant.
 
I know a young lady who had a baby and in 11 days it has had 4 surgeries. The last one really caught my attention. They had to cut the arteries on both sides of his neck because they were filled with blood clots.

I was really wanting to ask if the mom had been vaccinated and especially if she had one while pregnant.
That is truly heartbreaking and in all honest, those were the first questions that popped into my head too. . . Just oh wow what these vaccines have been doing to our babies.
 
Probably comes a new law in Germany that you have to vaccinate every 3 months against Corona, otherwise you are discriminated with mask compulsion and the like.
The German Minister of Health who after 4 vaccinations now has Corona himself also said that you can also mark vaccinated and unvaccinated by stickers to distinguish you.
Bad times FROM 1939 come back, and most will put up with it and will pick up every 3 months the death on installments at the doctor.
 
The CDC has changed
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20220812-070953.png
    Screenshot_20220812-070953.png
    493.3 KB · Views: 0
A couple friends of our had the "vaccine". They are both vegetarians and have always been very healthy. She is a retired trauma nurse. Now they are having a lot of health issues that they have attributed to the clot shot. I'm not sure just what issues they are having, but they are preparing for their end times now.
 
And Trump still supports these shots. Even though he would be without a doubt, better for our country, how can he be trusted? He has a great deal of explaining to do.
Politically he had no choice. Everyone in the country was demanding that he "do something". Many of us knew from the start this was all a big hoax, and a huge payout the the pharmaceutical companies.
I didnt like him pushing this Operation Warp speed either, but I still support Trump 100%.
 
And Trump still supports these shots. Even though he would be without a doubt, better for our country, how can he be trusted? He has a great deal of explaining to do.
Big distinction: Trump has never supported mandatory shots that I know of. He still leaves the choice completely up to the individual.
 
Big distinction: Trump has never supported mandatory shots that I know of. He still leaves the choice completely up to the individual.

Yeah if he did, there wouldn't need to be any explaining. He still recommends the shot to this day. That must not be overlooked.
 
Yeah if he did, there wouldn't need to be any explaining. He still recommends the shot to this day. That must not be overlooked.
Like Doc said, there's a big difference in recommending the shot than requiring it. The real question is, if not Trump then who? We need Trump more than ever, even with his minor faults.
 
Like Doc said, there's a big difference in recommending the shot than requiring it. The real question is, if not Trump then who? We need Trump more than ever, even with his minor faults.

I'm sure he has a real good reason to lie about the shots.
 
Probably comes a new law in Germany that you have to vaccinate every 3 months against Corona, otherwise you are discriminated with mask compulsion and the like.
The German Minister of Health who after 4 vaccinations now has Corona himself also said that you can also mark vaccinated and unvaccinated by stickers to distinguish you.
Bad times FROM 1939 come back, and most will put up with it and will pick up every 3 months the death on installments at the doctor.
Also the amount of illnesses caused to the vaccination rise. A lot of 2 to 3 times jabbed people suffer and deny more jabs.

The amount of premature births increased drastically, heart attacs, sudden deaths... The toll is rising. In combination with the actual energetic future, inflation, rising number of workless people and exploding bills everywhere i´d say they cook that frog in high speed. Maybe he will jump, but i´m not sure there.
 
Nuremburg Code

The idea of free or informed consent also served as the basis for International Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects proposed by the World Health Organization.
  1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment. The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs, or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.[13]
  2. The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.
  3. The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results will justify the performance of the experiment.
  4. The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.
  5. No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.
  6. The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.
  7. Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability, or death.
  8. The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.
  9. During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.
  10. During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgment required of him that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.
Above these principles of freely choosing to take the shots with full disclosure, they are violating the concept of "first, do no harm"!
 

Latest posts

Back
Top