Freaking kidding?
I would never kid about something like that. We already have troops over there training. We have already basically sent all of of defenses, leaving the US defenseless if our country was attacked, so why not Ukraine troops over here to train. Makes perfect sense cause these are brand new recruits.Freaking kidding?
Germany by example. I have seen in the news yesterday Germany has only enough ammo for 2 (!!) days in an serious conflict. The rest is almost in the UKR.Reports are that for every day the Ukraine shoots 5000 rounds of artillery, Russia shoots 20,000 rounds back.
Who is running out of ammo? Russia is reportedly producing around the clock 24/7 ammo and rockets.
Yes of course, Russia is the demon, the satan, worse than Stalin, Hitler, Saddam an Osama together, they eat babies and living in caves filled up with nuclear bombs.
The West, Nato and EU is innocent like an newborn, they absolutly never ever was provocate any single flysh*t, they are so carefull to the whole world.
Congrats Paul, the western propaganda catched you fully.
Propaganda comes from both sides.
But if western politicans say "deliver weapons creates peace" then i seriously have to ask myself who's the agressor.
And by crossing the border of another sovereign nation with military troops therefore i know other nation(s) who did the same and it was completly ok because they did it to deliver "peace" or "democracy" which wasn't work at the end. But the oil always was missing after.
When an foreign power crosses my border without invitation it's not ok, even they call it an "mission of peace".
And if someone delivers weapons from an national defense just to protect and save stolen money or values from an third party then this is mendacious and a betrayal of one's own people, especially when uninvolved peoples pay the price in the form of an economic crisis and very high inflation.
And exactly this happens in Europe this days. Citizens go betrayed, robbed out and don't know how to pay the daily life to protect the most corrupt state in Europe and his demanding comedian president.
But different meanings, i'm fine with it.
Imagine YOUR government opens the border to Mexico to "help" those poor people there. Offers them the better appartments. Pays them an health insurance, clothes, food and public traffic. And a few houndred $ every month as incoming. And YOU can pay more tax, higher prices in food store or do even need to leave your cheap house to fill it with refugees.
You're still say "Yes, we are so glad to help them"? (Then let me know, i take the next flight and land as an refugee)
Or you will more say "close the border and forget about them?
When I stand in line here, I see every day that 45% of the people in front of and behind me are not from my national population, about 20% of them do not even speak my national language or are willing to learn it.We do pretty much exactly that and have been since after WWII and the creation of the welfare system.
Many times I have stood in line behind someone, fresh from having her hair and nails done, in $300 sneakers, using food "stamps" buying better food than we could afford and yet our tax dollars go to feed them, clothe them and house them. Meanwhile, my kids were wearing garage sale shoes, eating grilled cheese and soup for dinner and living in a house that was a "handyman special". We pay for their hospital bills in upcharges when we go. Socialism sucks.
Enter your email address to join: