Pick your gender Identity now!

Homesteading & Country Living Forum

Help Support Homesteading & Country Living Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Proud Prepper1

Proud Prepper1

Awesome Friend
VIP Supporter
Neighbor
Joined
Mar 13, 2017
Messages
8,041
Location
Top secret
All who love liberty must now declare their gender identities and flood the culture with a zillion new genders
This is now the only way to achieve true “equality” under the law: We must all become trans-something. Perhaps you are a trans-philosopher, or a trans-political gender. Maybe you believe in trans-consciousness or trans-scription. Maybe you like to meditate using trans-indental gender meditation practices, or you are a mixed martial arts practitioner who is an expert in trans-kinetics.

Pick your gender identity now and you will be afforded special protections under U.S. law, thanks to SCOTUS.

You can even pick a gender that’s in alignment with the teachings of Christ. Call yourself a ChristHe or ChristShe, and suddenly all your Christian views are protected under the 1964 Civil Rights Act.

This is not satire. I’m dead serious about all this. They wrote the rules and said that “gender identity” can be anything you want. So make it your own. Everybody should now declare their new gender identity and demand protections under the 1964 Civil Rights Act.

In the same way that Facebook can’t ban your speech because you’re Black, now they can’t ban your speech if you’re a trans-philosopher, either. SCOTUS just made that into law.

It’s time for all Americans to invoke these special protections that have, before now, only been offered to Leftists and progressives. Now, thanks to SCOTUS, these special protections can apply to us all. What will your gender identity be?

I think I will simply make my gender identity, “Health Ranger” and start issuing Civil Rights demands to the tech companies to stop banning my speech or be found guilty of violating my civil rights. After all, I have a gender identity, too, and it demands I speak to people about health and nutrition without being censored.
 
Rellgar said:
All who love liberty must now declare their gender identities and flood the culture with a zillion new genders
This is now the only way to achieve true “equality” under the law: We must all become trans-something. Perhaps you are a trans-philosopher, or a trans-political gender. Maybe you believe in trans-consciousness or trans-scription. Maybe you like to meditate using trans-indental gender meditation practices, or you are a mixed martial arts practitioner who is an expert in trans-kinetics.

Pick your gender identity now and you will be afforded special protections under U.S. law, thanks to SCOTUS.

You can even pick a gender that’s in alignment with the teachings of Christ. Call yourself a ChristHe or ChristShe, and suddenly all your Christian views are protected under the 1964 Civil Rights Act.

This is not satire. I’m dead serious about all this. They wrote the rules and said that “gender identity” can be anything you want. So make it your own. Everybody should now declare their new gender identity and demand protections under the 1964 Civil Rights Act.

In the same way that Facebook can’t ban your speech because you’re Black, now they can’t ban your speech if you’re a trans-philosopher, either. SCOTUS just made that into law.

It’s time for all Americans to invoke these special protections that have, before now, only been offered to Leftists and progressives. Now, thanks to SCOTUS, these special protections can apply to us all. What will your gender identity be?

I think I will simply make my gender identity, “Health Ranger” and start issuing Civil Rights demands to the tech companies to stop banning my speech or be found guilty of violating my civil rights. After all, I have a gender identity, too, and it demands I speak to people about health and nutrition without being censored.
Click to expand...



Ooh :cool: Can I be gardengender??
 
Yes we have indeed entered into the theater of the absurd now. With no possible objective means of determining someone's gender identity, it's just what they say it is.

I'll need to think about what my chosen gender identity is so I can queue up for my protected status benefits.
VLcYhZw.gif
 
bigpaul said:
as far as I am concerned your gender is what you were born with.
the fact that surgeons can now change that gender is only cosmetic.
Click to expand...
I may have to disagree with you on this.

Everybody thinks you are either born male or female, and this isn't always true.

Intersex (partial hermaphrodite) births have been happening more frequently, and scientists aren't sure why. One theory is that prenatal care has gotten so goid that fetuses that would have ordinarily miscarried are now being brought to full term.

Surgeons often tell the parents that these conditions need to be "corrected" right away in infancy, and the child steered toward one gender or another, depending upon the surgeon's judgment.

The only problem is when the surgeon guesses wrong, and the kid grows up to be "gay" (assuming that homosexuality has any meaning with an intersex person).

Should such a person never marry?

It wasn't God that assigned a male or female gender, but a surgeon . . . who is human and--therefore--prone to make mistakes (unlike God).

Must such a person live in celibacy for the rest of "his" or "her" life if you think gay marriage is wrong?

How do we navigate out of this ethical morass without being hypocritical? I don't think anyone should grow old and be lonely unless that's what they want.

Under these circumstances, how would the Church approach a couple where one or both partners is intersex?
 
Kevin sometimes you spend too much time over thinking this kind of BS. A person is what they were born as. Period. Some mentally defective people may try to change what they were born as, but fortunately that's a very small percentage of the population. I really don't give 2 shits about them or their sick lifestyle choices.
 
The problem with the gay, trans, bi and what ever other group is not that we are against them but they DEMAND we be for them. Personally I don't give a rat's azz what somebody wants to be or who they want to do it with but they are not entitled to any special advantages. A trans woman (male body) athlete is not the same as a genetically female athlete. If a trans athlete women want to complete, then she / it can compete against the male athletes equipped with the same muscular mass and hormones. I don't care if they call themselves winged unicorns but don't require me to believe in them or root for them.

As for the surgeon guessing wrong, the only fool proof solution is to ban/forbid gender surgery until the candidate is a legal adult and can choose their own gender.. How does that solution appeal to you Kevin? Wonder how many suicides will happen to those left in limbo, not able deal with the trauma, until they reach adult maturity and can choose for them selves? Mother Nature is not a kind old lady but a nasty, remorseless, uncaring bitch. Some people will be dealt a rotten hand and we can force them to play it out or we can risk the surgeons getting it wrong. No fool proof solutions and no guaranteed happy endings.
 
there have only ever been 2 sexes and that's that, one can choose to be one or the other, personally I don't give a rats ass which someone chooses as long as I don't have to be involved.
at one time "gay" meant something completely different, as in "the gay widow", I find gays totally abhorrent but that's their decision, as a kid we called them "brown hatters" and "shirt lifters" and as for "cruising" in the parks after dark!!
 
Rellgar said:
All who love liberty must now declare their gender identities and flood the culture with a zillion new genders
This is now the only way to achieve true “equality” under the law: We must all become trans-something. Perhaps you are a trans-philosopher, or a trans-political gender. Maybe you believe in trans-consciousness or trans-scription. Maybe you like to meditate using trans-indental gender meditation practices, or you are a mixed martial arts practitioner who is an expert in trans-kinetics.

Pick your gender identity now and you will be afforded special protections under U.S. law, thanks to SCOTUS.

You can even pick a gender that’s in alignment with the teachings of Christ. Call yourself a ChristHe or ChristShe, and suddenly all your Christian views are protected under the 1964 Civil Rights Act.

This is not satire. I’m dead serious about all this. They wrote the rules and said that “gender identity” can be anything you want. So make it your own. Everybody should now declare their new gender identity and demand protections under the 1964 Civil Rights Act.

In the same way that Facebook can’t ban your speech because you’re Black, now they can’t ban your speech if you’re a trans-philosopher, either. SCOTUS just made that into law.

It’s time for all Americans to invoke these special protections that have, before now, only been offered to Leftists and progressives. Now, thanks to SCOTUS, these special protections can apply to us all. What will your gender identity be?

I think I will simply make my gender identity, “Health Ranger” and start issuing Civil Rights demands to the tech companies to stop banning my speech or be found guilty of violating my civil rights. After all, I have a gender identity, too, and it demands I speak to people about health and nutrition without being censored.
Click to expand...

The goes the same as for race/colour. If a gender is irrelevant to achieve equality then creating an endless list of genders isn't going to improve things. A person can identify as what ever they like but they don't need to share this information with others. I don't feel the need to walk around shouting "I am a white, heterosexual male" at every opportunity.
 
ShadowWolf 13 said:
I personally feel that you have as much right to be who you want to be as I have the right to be who I want to be if you DO NOT force your lifestyle(s) on me I WILL NOT force my lifestyle on you simple as that all the liberal PC nonsense seriously pisses me off :mad:
Click to expand...

Our not so Supreme Court has pushed their views upon all of us. How any of them can decide that they get to write legislature is beyond me. We could end up with a civil war over this single issue if they use this against Christians....which they will.

I know some are atheists and probably don’t care. Because if it doesn’t effect you, then nothing to get upset about, right? But somehow they support trannies and homosexuals.

(I need to read posts before saving. Had this post accusing you guys, not the general public)
 
Last edited:
I guess I see things differently because of job issues that I've encountered.

I'm a straight man, and--while I was a paramedic field training officer--I was assigned to work with a Canadian exchange student who was a paramedic and an RN, and studying to be a nurse practitioner.

I was considered to be an excellent paramedic by the standards of my time, but this guy that was assigned to me was better. A whole lot better. I actually learned more from him than he learned from me.

My point is that we ran on a sick kid, and I instructed my student to manage the call for several reasons. The biggest reason was that my intuition was telling me that I was missing something, and another reason is that sick kids have a tendency to "crash" (ie: deteriorate) very quickly.

The problem is that the kid's parents were very devout Southern Baptists, and had problems with the perceived effeminate mannerisms of my student. There was a real power struggle that erupted between myself and the parents, as I wanted the kid to have every edge for the purpose of keeping him alive, and the parents were worried that the brief exposure to a homosexual man would "turn their kid gay" since God doesn't make mistakes.

So, they would sue the ambulance company for me "endangering" their kid by exposing their sick child to a "homosexual child molester" and "homosexualist influences", and that I had no sense of ethics.

And so on.

I promise that I wasn't assigning my student to manage the call just to make the parents uncomfortable. My student had much more experience in pediatrics than I did, had worked in a pediatric intensive care unit for 6 years, and--as I indicated earlier--I had a strong sense that I was missing something important (which turned out to be true later).

I was actually excoriated because I was told that if the kid died, it wouldn't be any different than a Jehova's Witness's kid who may die from the parents refusing a blood transfusion . . . but at the same time, a paramedic is taught to be practical, and not overly concerned with theory in a crisis. We are expected to use any and all resources available to us to keep someone alive until they reach the hospital.

I saved the kid by assigning my student to manage the situation, but in their minds, I should have let the kid die because because my student is gay.

I have problems dealing with these kinds of conflicts, but perhaps this is because of my autism.

I will be very happy if this recent court ruling may keep stupid conflicts like this from occurring, if only for the sake of giving some leverage to healthcare workers who are trying to save peoples' lives in an emergency.
 
Last edited:
I figure I'll remain a male, who knows, maybe in 10 or 15 years if I live that long, I'll become an endangered specie and have laws that will protect my kind. On the other hand, I can be listed as an invasive specie and hunted down like a pig.

Seriously, this is fxxken nuts!
 
Kevin L said:
I guess I see things differently because of job issues that I've encountered.

I'm a straight man, and--while I was a paramedic field training officer--I was assigned to work with a Canadian exchange student who was a paramedic and an RN, and studying to be a nurse practitioner.

I was considered to be an excellent paramedic by the standards of my time, but this guy that was assigned to me was better. A whole lot better. I actually learned more from him than he learned from me.

My point is that we ran on a sick kid, and I instructed my student to manage the call for several reasons. The biggest reason was that my intuition was telling me that I was missing something, and another reason is that sick kids have a tendency to "crash" (ie: deteriorate) very quickly.

The problem is that the kid's parents were very devout Southern Baptists, and had problems with the perceived effeminate mannerisms of my student. There was a real power struggle that erupted between myself and the parents, as I wanted the kid to have every edge for the purpose of keeping him alive, and the parents were worried that the brief exposure to a homosexual man would "turn their kid gay" since God doesn't make mistakes.

So, they would sue the ambulance company for me "endangering" their kid by exposing their sick child to a "homosexual child molester" and "homosexualist influences", and that I had no sense of ethics.

And so on.

I promise that I wasn't assigning my student to manage the call just to make the parents uncomfortable. My student had much more experience in pediatrics than I did, had worked in a pediatric intensive care unit for 6 years, and--as I indicated earlier--I had a strong sense that I was missing something important (which turned out to be true later).

I was actually excoriated because I was told that if the kid died, it wouldn't be any different than a Jehova's Witness's kid who may die from the parents refusing a blood transfusion . . . but at the same time, a paramedic is taught to be practical, and not overly concerned with theory in a crisis. We are expected to use any and all resources available to us to keep someone alive until they reach the hospital.

I saved the kid by assigning my student to manage the situation, but in their minds, I should have let the kid die because because my student is gay.

I have problems dealing with these kinds of conflicts, but perhaps this is because of my autism.

I will be very happy if this recent court ruling may keep stupid conflicts like this from occurring, if only for the sake of giving some leverage to healthcare workers who are trying to save peoples' lives in an emergency.
Click to expand...

From what you’ve said, and that is all i can go from. It sounds like the parents were AFRAID, based upon their learning, experiences and beliefs. Did they really understand it was this kid who saved their son? Chances are they did see it that way. They probably saw this individual as a danger to their son.

Think of me what you will, but I personally don’t want a tranny or lesbian taking care of me. It would make me extremely uncomfortable!
 
GeorgiaPeachie said:
From what you’ve said, and that is all i can go from. It sounds like the parents were AFRAID, based upon their learning, experiences and beliefs. Did they really understand it was this kid who saved their son? Chances are they did see it that way. They probably saw this individual as a danger to their son.

Think of me what you will, but I personally don’t want a tranny or lesbian taking care of me. It would make me extremely uncomfortable!
Click to expand...
I don't judge you. I try (sometimes unsuccessfully) not to judge anyone.

If I had a kid with an exotic cancer, or a gunshot wound to head, etc., I wouldn't care if the surgeon was a tranny gay hermaphrodite . . . provided that this surgeon was the best chance for my kid's survival.

I've actually been in very similar situations to what I just described.

I had extensive damage to my back from my years in EMS, and I required surgery.

I did my research, and everything and everyone pointed toward a particular surgeon at the University of Miami Spinal Institute. This surgeon had done over 2,000 surgeries like mine with excellent patient outcomes, he was a consultant on spinal injuries with the VA hospital, and treated soldiers returning from the sandbox, he had written over a dozen papers in peer-reviewed medical journals that were well-received, and he had invented several surgical tools that were less invasive, and allowed for a more rapid recovery. On top of all this, he accepts my insurance.

Yet this guy (and I use the term "guy" very loosely) was gayer than Liberace and RuPaul combined.

I didn't care. Not in the slightest.

I wanted to walk again, and it's because of his surgery that I graduated from a walker to being fully mobile again, and getting into nursing school.

Does anyone here think that I should have accepted a lesser standard of care, a longer recovery, and residual paralysis simply because I should disqualify this excellent doctor based on religious principles because he's gay? If I did this, then how am I different from a Jehova's Witness who dies because he refuses a blood transfusion?
 
Arcticdude said:
I don't know why any "man" would want to have his parts cut off and have to sit down and pee like a woman. To a man, the whole world is our urnial. Excuse me while I go outside and stand up and pee.
Click to expand...

Sigh. After rereading my post I see I used “did” instead of “did not”. What I was striving to convey is they most likely DID NOT see the kid as being able to help their child. How would they know his knowledge or skills? Perhaps they saw him as more of a danger than anything else? Most people would not allow their child to die on purpose.

As for me, I am fine with gay men to talk to. Have enjoyed conversations with several through the years. It’s the lesbians that I will not ever allow to touch me. Had a bad experience at work with one years ago. Her being lesbian was allowed to do things others would never have gotten away with. And trannies? They are NUTS so why in the world would anyone let them touch them? Serious psychological problems should ban them from the health field entirely.

There are more than a few great surgeons and physicians who are not messed up in the head. I would search until I found one of them. I’m very picky when it comes to my physicians and their staff.

My oldest had an emergency when he was young. Took him to the emergency room and a doctor spotted him and yelled for orderlies to come grab him for surgery. For which I was extremely grateful. He was Russian and his bedside manner was not good. That didn’t bother me. But the nurse they sent to draw blood kept poking him without success. She didn’t speak English well at all. I did demand she leave and get another in who knew what they were doing. So parents do sometimes throw people out if they see a danger to their child.
 
JackDW said:
I think I will declare my gender as ALL. That way I can use any bathroom or shower room that is available. I can take advantage of any social program or "hand out" that are designed for any gender. I can have it all because I am a ALL.
Click to expand...

LOL. Really good one! Maybe I will to so I won’t have to wait for a toilet in the womens!
 
This really has to be the silliest discussion on this site.
I don't think that most of us here care if some mental deficient person wants to mutilate themselves in an attempt to be something they can never be. I just don't want to have these freaks anywhere around me or my grandkids.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Back
Top