Has anyone seen this - PlanDemic Part 1

[Maverick]

I'm not in conspiracy crap but.... if it's already been posted my apologies.

 

[Maverick]

Youtube been deleting this from everyone that posted it, if the above is deleted here is another link no from youtube

https://www.bitchute.com/video/aNjeT1G6iGTh/

 

[DrHenley]

http://www.doomsdayprepperforums.co...-red-meat-for-the-conspiracy-theorists.12631/
http://www.doomsdayprepperforums.com/index.php?threads/must-see-covid-19-video.12699/#post-184215

The more I read about Dr. Mikovits, the less inclined I am to believe her. But then it's hard to know what to believe nowadays.

Either she's a fraud, or she's the victim of a massive smear campaign. Supposedly her claims about the link between the XMRV virus and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome were due to lab contamination and backed up by falsified data. She smells of snake oil to me.

 

[Proud Prepper]

Why are you inclined to not believe her, the more you read? Is the smear campaign against her that thorough?

 

[DrHenley]

Like I said, she smells of snake oil to me.

Why she started losing credibility, from Wikipedia. But the story doesn't end there.

Harvey Whittemore and his wife Annette were frustrated by lack of answers for CFS patients, including their daughter. In an effort to solve the CFS problem, they created the Whittemore Peterson Institute in 2005; Mikovits became the research director in 2006.[10] Attempts to find a viral cause of CFS were unsuccessful.[11]
In 2007, Mikovits met a co-discoverer of XMRV, Robert Silverman, at a conference. Silverman had found XMRV sequences, which are highly similar to mouse genomic sequences, in prostate cancer specimens several years earlier. Using tools obtained from Silverman, Mikovits began to look for XMRV in her CFS samples. In late 2008, a graduate student, who subsequently was hired as her technician, obtained two positive results from a group of twenty samples. He and Mikovits successively altered the experimental conditions until all samples gave a positive signal.[11]
In 2009, Mikovits and co-workers reported in the journal Science that they had detected XMRV DNA in CFS patients and control subjects.[11][12] Negative results were published soon after, disputing Mikovits's findings.[11][13] Silverman, who was a co-author of the original XMRV-CFS article, told the Chicago Tribune that he was "concerned about lab contamination, despite our best efforts to avoid it."[14]
Two of the original authors of this paper subsequently reanalyzed the samples used in the research and found that the samples were contaminated with XMRV plasmid DNA, leading them to publish a partial retraction of their original results.[15] In December 2011 the editors of Science retracted the paper in its entirety.[16][17]
​

Now if you believe her, this was all a big conspiracy to discredit her. Until you read this:
https://twp.duke.edu/sites/twp.duke.edu/files/file-attachments/1441.full_.pdf

But the results of the biggest study of all had yet to come out. Funded by the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH) and led by Ian Lipkin of Columbia University, the $1 million multicenter project finally published its results on Tuesday in mBio—and not surprisingly, it concludes that the XMRV theory is really, really dead. What is surprising, scientists say, is that Judy Mikovits, the main author of the 2009 paper and the staunchest defender of a role for XMRV—or something closely related—is won over. Mikovits, who participated in Lipkin’s study, concedes it is “the definitive answer. … There is no evidence that XMRV is a human pathogen.”​

 

[Maverick]

As they say, Follow the Money

One thing for sure, nobody is being honest in virological research when money is involved, I think patents make the process corrupt then you have crap like this
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC545012/ - and this http://www.nbcnews.com/id/6809390/n...report-researchers-mumon-financial-interests/

New coronavirus legislation shows flaws with patent policy in America
https://thehill.com/opinion/technol...ion-shows-flaws-with-patent-policy-in-america

 

[Proud Prepper]

Like I said, she smells of snake oil to me.

Why she started losing credibility, from Wikipedia. But the story doesn't end there.

Harvey Whittemore and his wife Annette were frustrated by lack of answers for CFS patients, including their daughter. In an effort to solve the CFS problem, they created the Whittemore Peterson Institute in 2005; Mikovits became the research director in 2006.[10] Attempts to find a viral cause of CFS were unsuccessful.[11]
In 2007, Mikovits met a co-discoverer of XMRV, Robert Silverman, at a conference. Silverman had found XMRV sequences, which are highly similar to mouse genomic sequences, in prostate cancer specimens several years earlier. Using tools obtained from Silverman, Mikovits began to look for XMRV in her CFS samples. In late 2008, a graduate student, who subsequently was hired as her technician, obtained two positive results from a group of twenty samples. He and Mikovits successively altered the experimental conditions until all samples gave a positive signal.[11]
In 2009, Mikovits and co-workers reported in the journal Science that they had detected XMRV DNA in CFS patients and control subjects.[11][12] Negative results were published soon after, disputing Mikovits's findings.[11][13] Silverman, who was a co-author of the original XMRV-CFS article, told the Chicago Tribune that he was "concerned about lab contamination, despite our best efforts to avoid it."[14]
Two of the original authors of this paper subsequently reanalyzed the samples used in the research and found that the samples were contaminated with XMRV plasmid DNA, leading them to publish a partial retraction of their original results.[15] In December 2011 the editors of Science retracted the paper in its entirety.[16][17]
​

Now if you believe her, this was all a big conspiracy to discredit her. Until you read this:
https://twp.duke.edu/sites/twp.duke.edu/files/file-attachments/1441.full_.pdf

But the results of the biggest study of all had yet to come out. Funded by the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH) and led by Ian Lipkin of Columbia University, the $1 million multicenter project finally published its results on Tuesday in mBio—and not surprisingly, it concludes that the XMRV theory is really, really dead. What is surprising, scientists say, is that Judy Mikovits, the main author of the 2009 paper and the staunchest defender of a role for XMRV—or something closely related—is won over. Mikovits, who participated in Lipkin’s study, concedes it is “the definitive answer. … There is no evidence that XMRV is a human pathogen.”​

Oh well if its in Wikipedia, how can it not be 100% true.

 

[DrHenley]

Oh well if its in Wikipedia, how can it not be 100% true.

Did you read the second part? That quote from Wikipedia was to give background for the second part which wasn't from Wikipedia. She admitted that she was wrong after participating in a study that used her exact methodology and came up with different results.

Mikovits, who participated in Lipkin’s study, concedes it is “the definitive answer. … There is no evidence that XMRV is a human pathogen.”

No previous study had tried to replicate her findings using her exact methods, Mikovits says. “I’m forever grateful to Ian Lipkin for making it possible to participate,” she says. Lipkin says he is “proud” of Mikovits for accepting the outcome.

 

[Proud Prepper]

Did you read the second part? She admitted that she was wrong after participating in a study that used her methodology and came up with different results.

Yes and when did she admit it? Was it before or after she was arrested by the globalist?

General Flynn also admitted to things that he knew wasn't true.

 

[DrHenley]

No previous study had tried to replicate her findings using her exact methods, Mikovits says. “I’m forever grateful to Ian Lipkin for making it possible to participate,” she says. Lipkin says he is “proud” of Mikovits for accepting the outcome.