View attachment 7007
View attachment 7008
View attachment 7009
View attachment 7010
Okay so we have established that pretty much all of you are in agreement with my way thinking as it relates to "trophy hunting".
In law schools across America they teach that one can always argue both sides of an argument regardless of how ridiculous...
in order to justify action. Even murderers try to justify their actions by claiming self defense or claiming victims of abuse.
I in no way agree with or support trophy hunting of endangered species...particularly those as advanced as an elephant.
I also believe that killing elephants as an answer to conservation (an already substantially diminished population) is ridiculous.
This thread is about a trophy hunter not a conservationist. To argue that most people whom trophy hunt are conservationists...is even more ridiculous than trophy hunting itself.
This is my philosophy on that matter. Some can and will feel differently...that is perfectly alright.