Covid-19 Lawsuits

[ban1985]

These idiots who were voluntarily vaccinated had to sign one or two documents before the vaccination that they agree with the vaccination.

They have given away your fate to the state, so to speak, and the state is through the fine out, there has NEVER been a vaccination here where you had to sign documents before. Most sheep will not have read or understood these documents beforehand, yet you did.
The only ones who are not responsible for the crime are children who were forced by their parents to take the vaccination.
Of course, a year ago it was absolutely not pleasant to live in Europe as an unvaccinated person, the state has made us completely hell, that has already told me that something is wrong.

Corona was now for 2 years according to government reports, media and other EU channels something highly deadly and each and everyone who has refused the vaccination was publicly insulted as scum and asocial subhuman and beaten up by police officers and intimidated.

What is today? Since yesterday, the authorities in my country say that vaccination against Corona is no longer necessary, there is no longer a vaccination recommendation and the authorities say that doctors who still administer Corona vaccinations must be liable for damages themselves.

Those in the government are now afraid, very afraid, and that will have its reasons, they still have millions of doses of vaccine here in stock, more than the country has inhabitants, but the government now says that the vaccination program will be discontinued, so to speak, Corona is now a normal flu.

We were lied to, it was a genetic experiment, the consequences are slowly becoming visible and I am sure they have opened the gates of hell with this vaccination program.

 

[Survivor_316]

Wait, people had to sign something? Was that everywhere?

 

[ban1985]

In my country it was like that, how it was in the rest of Europe I don't know, Fact is, the sheep will not have thought about it yet, dennen it could not go fast enough that you got the shot.
Well, a part of the population was of course forced by all means by the authorities to get the shot, but since most of the word waiver no longer know and could not do without anything you have made the shot in the end quickly.

One thing is for sure, even if the people in the sheep category are partially sick today, don't see the fault in the vaccination but in everything else, these people would be right back in line if the government would say you need a new shot.
All lost idiots without own opinion and without brain are that....

 

[Danil54grl]

https://www.reuters.com/business/he...lleged-covid-vaccine-side-effects-2023-06-11/
HAMBURG, June 11 (Reuters) - BioNTech (22UAy.DE) will go to court on Monday to defend itself against a lawsuit from a German woman who is seeking damages for alleged side effects of its COVID-19 vaccine, the first of potentially hundreds of cases in the country.

The woman, exercising her right under German privacy law for her name not to be made public, is suing the German vaccine maker for at least 150,000 euro ($161,500) in damages for bodily harm as well as compensation for unspecified material damage, according to the regional court in Hamburg which is hearing the case and law firm Rogert & Ulbrich, which is representing her.

Advertisement · Scroll to continue

The plaintiff claims she suffered upper-body pain, swollen extremities, fatigue and sleeping disorder due to the vaccine.

The first hearing is on Monday.

Tobias Ulbrich, a lawyer at Rogert & Ulbrich, told Reuters he aimed to challenge in court the assessment made by European Union regulators and German vaccine assessment bodies that the BioNTech shot has a positive risk-benefit profile.

German pharmaceutical law states that makers of drugs or vaccines are only liable to pay damages for side-effects if "medical science" shows that their products cause disproportionate harm relative to their benefits or if the label information is wrong.

Advertisement · Scroll to continue

BioNTech, which holds the marketing authorisation in Germany for the shot it developed with Pfizer <PFE.N>, said it concluded after careful consideration that the case was without merit.

"The positive benefit-risk profile of Comirnaty remains positive and the safety profile has been well characterised," the biotech firm said, referring to the vaccine's brand name.

It noted about 1.5 billion people had received the shot across the world, including more than 64 million in Germany.

The European Medicines Agency (EMA) says that BioNTech's Comirnaty, the most commonly used in the Western world, is safe to use.

In a media briefing last week, the EMA reaffirmed the benefit of all COVID shots it approved, including BioNTech's, saying in the first year of the pandemic alone, vaccines were estimated to have helped save almost 20 million lives globally.

Advertisement · Scroll to continue

It has said there is a very small risk of myocarditis and pericarditis, two types of heart inflammation, following vaccination with Comirnaty, mainly for young males.

Unexpected side-effects after a drug has regulatory approval are rare. The unprecedented speed at which COVID vaccines were developed during the pandemic meant that potential uncommon side-effects may not have been detected as readily as they might have been in traditionally longer trials.

EMA has said that safety monitoring had not been compromised during the fast-track assessment.

The EMA had registered almost 1.7 million spontaneous reports of suspected side-effects by May, which translates into about 0.2 for every 100 administered doses.

Almost 768 million vaccine doses have been administered in the European Economic Area (EEA), which includes the 27 EU member states plus Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway.

The most common temporary side-effects are headache, fever, fatigue and muscle pain.

The EMA also monitors adverse events or illness after vaccination, and checks for frequencies that surpass normal rates in the non-vaccinated population.

LIABILITY​

It is not clear who would pay the legal costs or compensation if the plaintiff wins the case.

Sources have said some of the EU's bulk purchase agreements with vaccine makers, including BioNTech-Pfizer, contained full or partial liability waivers for both legal costs and potential compensation, which could force EU governments to bear some of the costs.

Like many countries, Germany also has a public sector financial support scheme for people who suffer permanent harm from vaccines, known as a no-fault compensation programme, but participation in the programme does not block someone seeking damages separately.

The United States has granted manufacturers immunity from liability for COVID vaccines that receive regulatory approval.

Rogert & Ulbrich says it has filed about 250 cases for clients seeking damages for alleged side-effects of COVID-19 vaccines.

Another law firm, Caesar-Preller, says it is representing 100 cases, with both firms saying separately they cover almost all cases in Germany between them.

A handful of similar cases have been filed in Italy.

($1 = 0.9289 euros)

Reporting by Ludwig Burger and Patricia Weiss; additional reporting by Emilio Parodi in Milan and Natalie Grover and Sam Tobin in London; editing by Josephine Mason and Mark Potter

 

[Bacon112179!!]

https://www.reuters.com/business/he...lleged-covid-vaccine-side-effects-2023-06-11/
HAMBURG, June 11 (Reuters) - BioNTech (22UAy.DE) will go to court on Monday to defend itself against a lawsuit from a German woman who is seeking damages for alleged side effects of its COVID-19 vaccine, the first of potentially hundreds of cases in the country.

The woman, exercising her right under German privacy law for her name not to be made public, is suing the German vaccine maker for at least 150,000 euro ($161,500) in damages for bodily harm as well as compensation for unspecified material damage, according to the regional court in Hamburg which is hearing the case and law firm Rogert & Ulbrich, which is representing her.

Advertisement · Scroll to continue

The plaintiff claims she suffered upper-body pain, swollen extremities, fatigue and sleeping disorder due to the vaccine.

The first hearing is on Monday.

Tobias Ulbrich, a lawyer at Rogert & Ulbrich, told Reuters he aimed to challenge in court the assessment made by European Union regulators and German vaccine assessment bodies that the BioNTech shot has a positive risk-benefit profile.

German pharmaceutical law states that makers of drugs or vaccines are only liable to pay damages for side-effects if "medical science" shows that their products cause disproportionate harm relative to their benefits or if the label information is wrong.

Advertisement · Scroll to continue

BioNTech, which holds the marketing authorisation in Germany for the shot it developed with Pfizer <PFE.N>, said it concluded after careful consideration that the case was without merit.

"The positive benefit-risk profile of Comirnaty remains positive and the safety profile has been well characterised," the biotech firm said, referring to the vaccine's brand name.

It noted about 1.5 billion people had received the shot across the world, including more than 64 million in Germany.

The European Medicines Agency (EMA) says that BioNTech's Comirnaty, the most commonly used in the Western world, is safe to use.

In a media briefing last week, the EMA reaffirmed the benefit of all COVID shots it approved, including BioNTech's, saying in the first year of the pandemic alone, vaccines were estimated to have helped save almost 20 million lives globally.

Advertisement · Scroll to continue

It has said there is a very small risk of myocarditis and pericarditis, two types of heart inflammation, following vaccination with Comirnaty, mainly for young males.

Unexpected side-effects after a drug has regulatory approval are rare. The unprecedented speed at which COVID vaccines were developed during the pandemic meant that potential uncommon side-effects may not have been detected as readily as they might have been in traditionally longer trials.

EMA has said that safety monitoring had not been compromised during the fast-track assessment.

The EMA had registered almost 1.7 million spontaneous reports of suspected side-effects by May, which translates into about 0.2 for every 100 administered doses.

Almost 768 million vaccine doses have been administered in the European Economic Area (EEA), which includes the 27 EU member states plus Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway.

The most common temporary side-effects are headache, fever, fatigue and muscle pain.

The EMA also monitors adverse events or illness after vaccination, and checks for frequencies that surpass normal rates in the non-vaccinated population.

LIABILITY​

It is not clear who would pay the legal costs or compensation if the plaintiff wins the case.

Sources have said some of the EU's bulk purchase agreements with vaccine makers, including BioNTech-Pfizer, contained full or partial liability waivers for both legal costs and potential compensation, which could force EU governments to bear some of the costs.

Like many countries, Germany also has a public sector financial support scheme for people who suffer permanent harm from vaccines, known as a no-fault compensation programme, but participation in the programme does not block someone seeking damages separately.

The United States has granted manufacturers immunity from liability for COVID vaccines that receive regulatory approval.

Rogert & Ulbrich says it has filed about 250 cases for clients seeking damages for alleged side-effects of COVID-19 vaccines.

Another law firm, Caesar-Preller, says it is representing 100 cases, with both firms saying separately they cover almost all cases in Germany between them.

A handful of similar cases have been filed in Italy.

($1 = 0.9289 euros)

Reporting by Ludwig Burger and Patricia Weiss; additional reporting by Emilio Parodi in Milan and Natalie Grover and Sam Tobin in London; editing by Josephine Mason and Mark Potter

The first domino?

 

[ban1985]

https://www.reuters.com/business/he...lleged-covid-vaccine-side-effects-2023-06-11/
HAMBURG, June 11 (Reuters) - BioNTech (22UAy.DE) will go to court on Monday to defend itself against a lawsuit from a German woman who is seeking damages for alleged side effects of its COVID-19 vaccine, the first of potentially hundreds of cases in the country.

The woman, exercising her right under German privacy law for her name not to be made public, is suing the German vaccine maker for at least 150,000 euro ($161,500) in damages for bodily harm as well as compensation for unspecified material damage, according to the regional court in Hamburg which is hearing the case and law firm Rogert & Ulbrich, which is representing her.

Advertisement · Scroll to continue

The plaintiff claims she suffered upper-body pain, swollen extremities, fatigue and sleeping disorder due to the vaccine.

The first hearing is on Monday.

Tobias Ulbrich, a lawyer at Rogert & Ulbrich, told Reuters he aimed to challenge in court the assessment made by European Union regulators and German vaccine assessment bodies that the BioNTech shot has a positive risk-benefit profile.

German pharmaceutical law states that makers of drugs or vaccines are only liable to pay damages for side-effects if "medical science" shows that their products cause disproportionate harm relative to their benefits or if the label information is wrong.

Advertisement · Scroll to continue

BioNTech, which holds the marketing authorisation in Germany for the shot it developed with Pfizer <PFE.N>, said it concluded after careful consideration that the case was without merit.

"The positive benefit-risk profile of Comirnaty remains positive and the safety profile has been well characterised," the biotech firm said, referring to the vaccine's brand name.

It noted about 1.5 billion people had received the shot across the world, including more than 64 million in Germany.

The European Medicines Agency (EMA) says that BioNTech's Comirnaty, the most commonly used in the Western world, is safe to use.

In a media briefing last week, the EMA reaffirmed the benefit of all COVID shots it approved, including BioNTech's, saying in the first year of the pandemic alone, vaccines were estimated to have helped save almost 20 million lives globally.

Advertisement · Scroll to continue

It has said there is a very small risk of myocarditis and pericarditis, two types of heart inflammation, following vaccination with Comirnaty, mainly for young males.

Unexpected side-effects after a drug has regulatory approval are rare. The unprecedented speed at which COVID vaccines were developed during the pandemic meant that potential uncommon side-effects may not have been detected as readily as they might have been in traditionally longer trials.

EMA has said that safety monitoring had not been compromised during the fast-track assessment.

The EMA had registered almost 1.7 million spontaneous reports of suspected side-effects by May, which translates into about 0.2 for every 100 administered doses.

Almost 768 million vaccine doses have been administered in the European Economic Area (EEA), which includes the 27 EU member states plus Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway.

The most common temporary side-effects are headache, fever, fatigue and muscle pain.

The EMA also monitors adverse events or illness after vaccination, and checks for frequencies that surpass normal rates in the non-vaccinated population.

LIABILITY​

It is not clear who would pay the legal costs or compensation if the plaintiff wins the case.

Sources have said some of the EU's bulk purchase agreements with vaccine makers, including BioNTech-Pfizer, contained full or partial liability waivers for both legal costs and potential compensation, which could force EU governments to bear some of the costs.

Like many countries, Germany also has a public sector financial support scheme for people who suffer permanent harm from vaccines, known as a no-fault compensation programme, but participation in the programme does not block someone seeking damages separately.

The United States has granted manufacturers immunity from liability for COVID vaccines that receive regulatory approval.

Rogert & Ulbrich says it has filed about 250 cases for clients seeking damages for alleged side-effects of COVID-19 vaccines.

Another law firm, Caesar-Preller, says it is representing 100 cases, with both firms saying separately they cover almost all cases in Germany between them.

A handful of similar cases have been filed in Italy.

($1 = 0.9289 euros)

Reporting by Ludwig Burger and Patricia Weiss; additional reporting by Emilio Parodi in Milan and Natalie Grover and Sam Tobin in London; editing by Josephine Mason and Mark Potter

Believe me, the case will be dismissed or the judge will blame a "pre-existing condition", there will be no judgment against the vaccine industry and politicians.

Politicians have bought judges and media and the pharmaceutical industry will deny everything, there is a lot of money involved.
Politicians and judges also know that if there is a successful lawsuit against Biontech that there will be thousands of lawsuits and the state will go financially bankrupt and it will be in the future only a minimal part of the people in the next (planned) pandemic vaccinate, the regime will know how to prevent an admission of guilt with all means, especially in Europe.

 

[ban1985]

As I wrote, the negotiation was canceled, and it is likely that the next round of negotiations will also be canceled for some reason.

This is judicial justice made in Europe.

https://www.focus.de/panorama/welt/...lichem-impfschaden-abgesagt_id_196196617.html

 

[Mountain Dragon]

As I wrote, the negotiation was canceled, and it is likely that the next round of negotiations will also be canceled for some reason.

This is judicial justice made in Europe.

https://www.focus.de/panorama/welt/...lichem-impfschaden-abgesagt_id_196196617.html

No surprise at all to me.

 

[Danil54grl]

https://www.zerohedge.com/medical/c...manufacturer-over-alleged-deceptive-practices

 

[Danil54grl]

https://covidpenalty.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Complaint-Filed.pdf

 

[Danil54grl]

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/sarah...awyers-work-to-put-fauci-behind-bars-n2631091
A group of Florida lawyers are working to prosecute Dr. Anthony Fauci in his response and involvement in COVID-19.

In a press release, Vires Law Group called for an investigation by Florida's attorney general, Ashley Moody, claiming that "Murder, terrorism, and a host of abuses have been committed."

"On October 24, 2023, a request for a criminal investigation, particularly regarding the crime of Second Degree Murder while Committing Acts of Terrorism by Anthony Fauci and several other high-level federal officials, as well as Administrators of hospital systems providing care to patients in Florida, ("Accused") was filed with the Attorney General of the State of Florida," the Vires Law Group wrote.

More from NTD on Moody's response to Rachel Rodriguez, founder of the Vires Law Group:

The official referenced how the Florida Supreme Court in late 2022 approved a request from Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis to empanel a statewide grand jury to investigate COVID-19 vaccine manufacturers and others involved in providing the vaccines to Florida residents. The official said that an appointee of Ms. Moody was serving as the grand jury's legal adviser. Still, because of "the confidential nature" of the grand jury, the office was "not at liberty to comment on these matters." In another message, the official said that Ms. Moody's duties "are prescribed by law" without providing further details. "We trust that we will be able to discuss with our top state law enforcement officials these extremely important and pressing concerns of the people of Florida and seek justice on behalf of the families of tens of thousands of murdered Floridians due to the criminal acts of the federal officials and Florida state hospital administrators we have identified in our brief requesting investigation," Ms. Rodriguez told The Epoch Times via email. Lawyers are still working to meet with Ms. Moody and Nicholas Cox, who heads the Florida Attorney General's Office of Statewide Prosecution after being appointed by the attorney general, "to discuss the evidence we have presented and assist them in any way they may need pertaining to this critical investigation," Ms. Rodriguez added.

According to a February 1, 2020 email, the lawyers allege that Fauci suspected a mutation in the virus was "intentionally inserted." They believe Fauci knew that COVID-19 was created through a type of research that enhances or adds a function but lied when asked.

The lawyers pointed to several criminal offenses that Fauci committed against Florida residents.

They noted that he advocated for a drug called remdesivir as a COVID-19 treatment, which trial results showed people who received the drug recovered faster. However, there was no statistically significant effect on mortality.

Later, Fauci admitted it was an "imperfect drug" and that he publicized the trial results because he thought they would be leaked.

"[Fauci] promoted a drug they knew caused more harm than good for patients, purposefully misrepresented the data showing its harmful effects, preventing any possibility of informed consent, and then forced that drug upon the citizens of Florida to the exclusion of other effective, beneficial licensed drugs," the group stated.

The lawyers are demanding charges against Fauci that include aggravated manslaughter of the elderly, disabled, or children.

 

[Oddcaliber]

Need a lot more than 1 state. How about adding 49 more.

 

[Bacon112179!!]

Need a lot more than 1 state. How about adding 49 more.

Would be nice.

 

[Danil54grl]

I would really love to see Ken Paxton jump in with this kind of lawsuit.

 

[Bacon112179!!]

No commitment. Everyone is walking around on eggshells, not to piss anyone off.

 

[Danil54grl]

https://texasattorneygeneral.gov/ne...ting-covid-19-vaccine-efficacy-and-conspiringNovember 30, 2023 | Press Release

Attorney General Ken Paxton Sues Pfizer for Misrepresenting COVID-19 Vaccine Efficacy and Conspiring to Censor Public Discourse​

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has sued Pfizer, Inc., for unlawfully misrepresenting the effectiveness of the company’s COVID-19 vaccine and attempting to censor public discussion of the product.
Pfizer engaged in false, deceptive, and misleading acts and practices by making unsupported claims regarding the company’s COVID-19 vaccine in violation of the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act.
The pharmaceutical company's widespread representation that its vaccine possessed 95% efficacy against infection was highly misleading. That metric represented a calculation of the so-called “relative risk reduction” for vaccinated individuals in Pfizer’s initial, two-month clinical trial results. FDA publications indicate “relative risk reduction” is a misleading statistic that “unduly influence” consumer choice. Pfizer was also put on notice at that time that vaccine protection could not accurately be predicted beyond two months. Nevertheless, Pfizer fostered a misleading impression that vaccine protection was durable and withheld from the public information that undermined its claims about the duration of protection. And, despite the fact that its clinical trial failed to measure whether the vaccine protects against transmission, Pfizer embarked on a campaign to intimidate the public into getting the vaccine as a necessary measure to protect their loved ones.
In fact, Pfizer’s product failed to live up to the company’s representations. COVID-19 cases increased after widespread vaccine administration, and some areas saw a greater percentage of deaths from COVID-19 among the vaccinated population than the unvaccinated. When the failure of its product became apparent, Pfizer then pivoted to silencing truth-tellers. The lawsuit notes: “How did Pfizer respond when it became apparent that its vaccine was failing and the viability of its cash cow was threatened? By intimidating those spreading the truth, and by conspiring to censor its critics. Pfizer labeled as ‘criminals’ those who spread facts about the vaccine. It accused them of spreading ‘misinformation.’ And it coerced social media platforms to silence prominent truth-tellers.”
“We are pursuing justice for the people of Texas, many of whom were coerced by tyrannical vaccine mandates to take a defective product sold by lies,” said Attorney General Paxton. “The facts are clear. Pfizer did not tell the truth about their COVID-19 vaccines. Whereas the Biden Administration weaponized the pandemic to force illegal public health decrees on the public and enrich pharmaceutical companies, I will use every tool I have to protect our citizens who were misled and harmed by Pfizer’s actions.”
The lawsuit follows Attorney General Paxton’s investigation into Pfizer and other vaccine manufacturers announced earlier this year.
To read the petition, click here.

 

[Bacon112179!!]

https://texasattorneygeneral.gov/ne...ting-covid-19-vaccine-efficacy-and-conspiringNovember 30, 2023 | Press Release

Attorney General Ken Paxton Sues Pfizer for Misrepresenting COVID-19 Vaccine Efficacy and Conspiring to Censor Public Discourse​

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has sued Pfizer, Inc., for unlawfully misrepresenting the effectiveness of the company’s COVID-19 vaccine and attempting to censor public discussion of the product.
Pfizer engaged in false, deceptive, and misleading acts and practices by making unsupported claims regarding the company’s COVID-19 vaccine in violation of the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act.
The pharmaceutical company's widespread representation that its vaccine possessed 95% efficacy against infection was highly misleading. That metric represented a calculation of the so-called “relative risk reduction” for vaccinated individuals in Pfizer’s initial, two-month clinical trial results. FDA publications indicate “relative risk reduction” is a misleading statistic that “unduly influence” consumer choice. Pfizer was also put on notice at that time that vaccine protection could not accurately be predicted beyond two months. Nevertheless, Pfizer fostered a misleading impression that vaccine protection was durable and withheld from the public information that undermined its claims about the duration of protection. And, despite the fact that its clinical trial failed to measure whether the vaccine protects against transmission, Pfizer embarked on a campaign to intimidate the public into getting the vaccine as a necessary measure to protect their loved ones.
In fact, Pfizer’s product failed to live up to the company’s representations. COVID-19 cases increased after widespread vaccine administration, and some areas saw a greater percentage of deaths from COVID-19 among the vaccinated population than the unvaccinated. When the failure of its product became apparent, Pfizer then pivoted to silencing truth-tellers. The lawsuit notes: “How did Pfizer respond when it became apparent that its vaccine was failing and the viability of its cash cow was threatened? By intimidating those spreading the truth, and by conspiring to censor its critics. Pfizer labeled as ‘criminals’ those who spread facts about the vaccine. It accused them of spreading ‘misinformation.’ And it coerced social media platforms to silence prominent truth-tellers.”
“We are pursuing justice for the people of Texas, many of whom were coerced by tyrannical vaccine mandates to take a defective product sold by lies,” said Attorney General Paxton. “The facts are clear. Pfizer did not tell the truth about their COVID-19 vaccines. Whereas the Biden Administration weaponized the pandemic to force illegal public health decrees on the public and enrich pharmaceutical companies, I will use every tool I have to protect our citizens who were misled and harmed by Pfizer’s actions.”
The lawsuit follows Attorney General Paxton’s investigation into Pfizer and other vaccine manufacturers announced earlier this year.
To read the petition, click here.

Don't forget the troll under the bridge fauchi. Hang him up by a toe.

 

[GeorgiaPeachie]

WOOHOO!!! So good to see real justice!

 

[Danil54grl]

https://aflegal.org/america-first-l...chloroquine-and-ivermectin-to-treat-covid-19/WASHINGTON, D.C. – America First Legal (AFL) has sued the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for illegally concealing government records related to the suppression of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and ivermectin to treat COVID-19.

Last year, AFL filed Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests to obtain documents to determine when and why government officials, including Dr. Anthony Fauci, decided to discourage and suppress the use of HCQ and Ivermectin to treat or mitigate COVID-19 symptoms. HHS and the FDA have failed to turn over these documents.

America First Legal is committed to holding these agencies accountable under the law and uncovering these documents for the American public.

Statement from Reed D. Rubinstein, America First Legal Senior Counselor and Director of Oversight and Investigation:

“The true reasons for the federal government’s assault on HCQ and ivermectin have never been made public. We don’t know why – in the midst of a pandemic – the government went after doctors prescribing these potentially useful drugs and coerced pharmacies into rejecting prescriptions. But AFL will keep fighting to see that the truth about Dr. Fauci and his colleagues is exposed.“ said Reed D. Rubinstein.

Read the lawsuit here.

 

[Proud Prepper]

https://aflegal.org/america-first-l...chloroquine-and-ivermectin-to-treat-covid-19/WASHINGTON, D.C. – America First Legal (AFL) has sued the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for illegally concealing government records related to the suppression of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and ivermectin to treat COVID-19.

Last year, AFL filed Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests to obtain documents to determine when and why government officials, including Dr. Anthony Fauci, decided to discourage and suppress the use of HCQ and Ivermectin to treat or mitigate COVID-19 symptoms. HHS and the FDA have failed to turn over these documents.

America First Legal is committed to holding these agencies accountable under the law and uncovering these documents for the American public.

Statement from Reed D. Rubinstein, America First Legal Senior Counselor and Director of Oversight and Investigation:

“The true reasons for the federal government’s assault on HCQ and ivermectin have never been made public. We don’t know why – in the midst of a pandemic – the government went after doctors prescribing these potentially useful drugs and coerced pharmacies into rejecting prescriptions. But AFL will keep fighting to see that the truth about Dr. Fauci and his colleagues is exposed.“ said Reed D. Rubinstein.

Read the lawsuit here.

They need to be held accountable up on the gallows. Lawsuits do nothing.