Climate Change

Doomsday Prepper Forums

Help Support Doomsday Prepper Forums:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Politics and Crazy Politics sometimes merge. Biden has pressured Scholtz unto cutting off the Nordstream 2 pipeline. Biden says Germans will only have to shiver until global warming kicks in and heats their houses. And while waiting for that to happen, Russia goes bankrupt.

Just another part of WEF’s plans to drastically reduce the world’s population down to one billion or less.

So far they have implemented these plans to kill us:

Covid 19
Vaxx for Covid 19 (kills or removes ability to procreate)
Remove access of drugs that Cure Covid 19
Reduce Fertilizer so less crops able to be grown
Reduce oil production to cause food prices to soar
Taken steps to Crash 1st World economies
Clog up and slow down distribution of food with new laws
 
Lol, the only "scientists" who deny man-made climate change are those who are financed by the oil companies. THEY are the paid liars.
That's just silly. Would you include Freeman Dyson in that? Most of the geologists on the planet? Scientists like Peter Ridd? Many who are speaking out are retired and have no funding from anywhere. Those that have jobs keep quiet so they can keep their jobs, (or get fired for speaking out like Peter Ridd). And it wouldn't matter anyway. The first thing to understand about science is that it doesn't matter who 'believes' a hypothesis or 'denies' a hypothesis, or how many scientists believe or deny it, or who finances them. If a million pieces of evidence support a hypothesis and a million scientists believe it, and one piece of evidence proves the hypothesis wrong, the hypothesis is wrong. Period.

If the hypothesis were correct there ought to be correlation throughout the history of this planet showing that CO2 has been the driver of climate. There is no such evidence. Usually there is no correlation at all -- CO2 can be in the 1000s of ppm during ice ages for example; CO2 can be going down when temperatures are going up and vice versa; in the interglacials, such as the one we're in, CO2 rise lags behind the temperature rise by hundreds of years. There was good correlation from 1980 to 2000 -- a period of 20 years in 4.5 billion years. There has been no correlation since. You just have to read old newspapers from a hundred years ago to see it's a nonsense. If the hypothesis were correct there would be good correlation throughout the earth's history, and it simply isn't there.

Nobody denies that the greenhouse effect exists, but it is only one of around 200 factors that affect the climate. Most of these factors are not included in the computer 'models', and there are numerous other greenhouse gases besides CO2 anyway. All the so-called 'evidence' comes from computer 'models' that have proved a total failure, because computer models are not meant to be used to make predictions -- they're essentially a bunch of equations with guesses in them, good for comparisons but hopeless as tarot cards. Nobody denies that the climate is changing either. Of course it's changing, that is the only constant about climate. It changes. You are right to prep for that. We all need to prepare for whatever changes the climate throws at us.
 
just wait until they start outlawing private ownership of acreage.... in the name of climate change so that all farmable land is controlled and managed by gubbermints in the name of the collective good... it's for the children dontcha know
 
Just another part of WEF’s plans to drastically reduce the world’s population down to one billion or less.

So far they have implemented these plans to kill us:

Covid 19
Vaxx for Covid 19 (kills or removes ability to procreate)
Remove access of drugs that Cure Covid 19
Reduce Fertilizer so less crops able to be grown
Reduce oil production to cause food prices to soar
Taken steps to Crash 1st World economies
Clog up and slow down distribution of food with new laws

It is true and really just that simple.
 
That's just silly. Would you include Freeman Dyson in that? Most of the geologists on the planet? Scientists like Peter Ridd? Many who are speaking out are retired and have no funding from anywhere. Those that have jobs keep quiet so they can keep their jobs, (or get fired for speaking out like Peter Ridd). And it wouldn't matter anyway. The first thing to understand about science is that it doesn't matter who 'believes' a hypothesis or 'denies' a hypothesis, or how many scientists believe or deny it, or who finances them. If a million pieces of evidence support a hypothesis and a million scientists believe it, and one piece of evidence proves the hypothesis wrong, the hypothesis is wrong. Period.

If the hypothesis were correct there ought to be correlation throughout the history of this planet showing that CO2 has been the driver of climate. There is no such evidence. Usually there is no correlation at all -- CO2 can be in the 1000s of ppm during ice ages for example; CO2 can be going down when temperatures are going up and vice versa; in the interglacials, such as the one we're in, CO2 rise lags behind the temperature rise by hundreds of years. There was good correlation from 1980 to 2000 -- a period of 20 years in 4.5 billion years. There has been no correlation since. You just have to read old newspapers from a hundred years ago to see it's a nonsense. If the hypothesis were correct there would be good correlation throughout the earth's history, and it simply isn't there.

Nobody denies that the greenhouse effect exists, but it is only one of around 200 factors that affect the climate. Most of these factors are not included in the computer 'models', and there are numerous other greenhouse gases besides CO2 anyway. All the so-called 'evidence' comes from computer 'models' that have proved a total failure, because computer models are not meant to be used to make predictions -- they're essentially a bunch of equations with guesses in them, good for comparisons but hopeless as tarot cards. Nobody denies that the climate is changing either. Of course it's changing, that is the only constant about climate. It changes. You are right to prep for that. We all need to prepare for whatever changes the climate throws at us.

Earth's climatic fluctuations have to be seen through the lens of geologic time. Within the last 3 million years, the Pleistocene, the age of ice, we have been warmer (and colder) than present many times. If we were colder, then we warmed up and we did this long before Homo sapiens. So, earth has natural mechanisms both for losing and retaining heat. These will work whether the warming is caused naturally or if it is man-made so the issue of man-made global warming is moot.

CO2 is just a part of the oxygen cycle which is a completely natural system. At times earth has had more CO2 than present and we were warmer. One theory is they uplift of the Indian Continental Plate from the seabed exposed billions of tons of calcium carbonate from dead diatoms on that seabed which now formed the Himalaya Mountain chain. This calcium carbonate was still able to absorb additional CO2 from rainwater (CO2 was dissolved in that rainwater). This was the early Asian Monsoon. So much CO2 was removed from the atmosphere in this way that the earth went into the first ice age.
 
All of the religious-like cults on the left which the minions follow are just Communist nonsense designed to convince the minions to live in poverty and anger.

The poverty hasn't come yet because they haven't succeeded, but they sure live in anger. Those who swallow Communist propaganda are Narcissists and Narcissists are natural tyrants.
 
All of the religious-like cults on the left which the minions follow are just Communist nonsense designed to convince the minions to live in poverty and anger.

The poverty hasn't come yet because they haven't succeeded, but they sure live in anger. Those who swallow Communist propaganda are Narcissists and Narcissists are natural tyrants.

They want us to live in a world in which technology solves nothing and we have to go back to a primitive existence.
 
They want us to live in a world in which technology solves nothing and we have to go back to a primitive existence.
Only for the "unwashed masses." The elites will have every technological advantage known to man. Still fly around in private jets, eat caviar and foie gras, and laugh their asses off at the stupid morons that put them in power.
 
I don´t understand why so many of you don´t believe in climate change. I see climate change as at least one of the top 5 reason to start prepping.
Because I think it it afflicted. You think pretty highly of yourself when you feel you can completely control the ecosystem. Just my opinion. But , likewise whether or not someone preps for whatever reason they will be the ones accountable for their choices. Just me thinking.
 
Till the next asteroid lands in the middle of davos and takes them all by surprise?????
This asteroide preferably hits Davos very exactly in the center or it may will let me know before. Switzerland isn't that big and i won't die with the WEF-guests.
Thanks.
 
The amount of energy the sun puts into the Earth makes our power output look like a candle to a volcano.

The Gulf of Mexico alone recieves between 8 and 15 trillion watts per day from the Sun.

This drives ocean currents. Nothing man can do can drive ocean currents or stop them.
 
??????? Hold on , I'm still catching up...Hubris? That's a new one on me. But I like it.
The word came from the ancient Greeks meaning "Overweening presumption that leads a person to disregard the divinely fixed limits on human action in an ordered cosmos"

In Greek mythology it's what got the Greek gods mad at people, resulting in the gods intervening. Greek mythology is full of stories about hubris causing dire consequences.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top