Chat Messages

Doomsday Prepper Forums

Help Support Doomsday Prepper Forums:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
I've had many conversations with various preppers and many seem to have one idea in common. That idea is to align themselves with other like-minded people (admittedly, I have) to fill in the voids in their particular skill sets and needs. For example, a family good at gardening might plan to bug out or hunker down with their cousin who has tactical training. The tactical guy may have a friend that is a good medic and so forth. I hear very little among preppers that suggests they could manage entirely on their own, nor has many of them tried to in practice for any significant amount of time. This raises a huge issue. Suddenly, everyone values their own skills so much that they feel they have earned their way as a member of the group with their presence alone when their particular skills are not needed. At this point the gardener is ticked off because he sees the entire group as socialistic in that they all depend on each other unfairly. My question to the group is this: How many people have put thought into that situation and have a means to deal with it that doesn't involve a coup and friends dying? To think that everyone will have the same ambition level and willingness to learn new skills seems like a stretch for most of the people I know.
 
Where are you from (roughly) robinjopo? I live in northern MN and our temps follow closely to what you report. Just curious...
 
I just walked the perimeter and noticed the ironwood tree holding my targets broke off behind the target. Im guessing the wind helped a little but the fact I cut a tree down with the 9 has me excited lol
 
I've had many conversations with various preppers and many seem to have one idea in common. That idea is to align themselves with other like-minded people (admittedly, I have) to fill in the voids in their particular skill sets and needs. For example, a family good at gardening might plan to bug out or hunker down with their cousin who has tactical training. The tactical guy may have a friend that is a good medic and so forth. I hear very little among preppers that suggests they could manage entirely on their own, nor has many of them tried to in practice for any significant amount of time. This raises a huge issue. Suddenly, everyone values their own skills so much that they feel they have earned their way as a member of the group with their presence alone when their particular skills are not needed. At this point the gardener is ticked off because he sees the entire group as socialistic in that they all depend on each other unfairly. My question to the group is this: How many people have put thought into that situation and have a means to deal with it that doesn't involve a coup and friends dying? To think that everyone will have the same ambition level and willingness to learn new skills seems like a stretch for most of the people I know.

I look at everyone having enough value, not equal value. Don't think everyone is going to be equal in value, they won't.

Even if you have one person that is 10 times more valuable and does most of the work out of the group than any one else, that person will still need the help of the others for the group to succeed.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top