‘Scientists’ and ‘Doctors’ at The Lancet and Nature Have Blood on Their Evil Hands

Doomsday Prepper Forums

Help Support Doomsday Prepper Forums:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Nature is nature. The Lancet is the British Medical Journal. I used to rely on the Lancet in college for research but we quickly found out the Lancet has huge problems. Some are statistical, some are just built in crap. Let me give you an example. How many time have you heard the words "Clinical Study" or "Clinical Trial"? Do you know what that really means? It means whoever walks into the clinic. They do not control for sex, race, age, occupation---they just lump it all together. Fauci says "clinical study" every time he talks. A clinical study is worthless in science. Another point: sample size. You have to have a sample size within your study group (segregated by sex, race, age and occupation) which is large enough for those results to be valid. There is a mathematical formula for this. Once this level has been met, the study can be said to be "statistically significant". It has to say "statistically significant" up front to be statistically significant. If it is not statistically significant, it is not science. The Lancet violates this concept all the time. In short, if some study is not statistically significant it is totally worthless.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top