Your Neighbors

Doomsday Prepper Forums

Help Support Doomsday Prepper Forums:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
I am not concerned much about the people in my neighborhood, because most are white and between 50-75. But I am more concerned about the neighboring neighborhood because they are slightly lower or lower middle class.
 
I am not concerned much about the people in my neighborhood, because most are white and between 50-75. But I am more concerned about the neighboring neighborhood because they are slightly lower or lower middle class.

Truthfully though, we really shouldn't judge folks by the size of their pocket book nor solely base opinions along racial lines ;) A bad neighborhood is just that a bad neighborhood though all are not bad folks, I have seen bad white neighborhoods as will as black and as I said above perception can be deceiving, if it is a bad neighborhood avoid it. Despair follows no racial lines, in a shtf situation whites and blacks are not to be trusted all races will become hunter gatherers and I don't mean that in a good way ;)
 
That's because anti-racist is a code word for anti-White. They say they're anti-racist, but what they really are, is anti-White.
 
That's because anti-racist is a code word for anti-White. They say they're anti-racist, but what they really are, is anti-White.

It's the white apologist of the left that's creating the racial divide and creating the hornets nest using the black agitators as surrogates like Jackson and sharpton. This isn't a black on white nor a white on black but a white on white that's the problem!
 
wise words Mav!!

trust is a difficult thing,hard to earn,easy to loose....
 
Brent, sure. Were you being ironic, as in, "You don't say"? Such impressions are sometimes hard to read through online posts, especially from folks that we don't know personally.
Everybody says there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.

The Netherlands and Belgium are just as crowded as Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.

Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.

What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?

How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?

And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?

But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.

They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.

Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.
 
Billy, race is not the problem, it's a people problem, both sides is guilty, race is only a problem because both sides make it a problem, I detest the phrase white power as much as I detest the phrase black power. nazism is pure evil and there ain't no sugar coating it and that's a fact! I don't claim myself superior over anyone, I know far more black folks that are far more smarter than I and the same be said about the Jews, I live within the confinements as I see it, bringing race to an argument does nothing but show the hatred and that just shows how ignorant man really is!
 
Well, I understand your position, but I guess the Founding Fathers who wrote the Naturalization Act of 1790 and I will have to humbly disagree with you. I respect your right to a differing opinion, of course.
 
Actually, after our Founding Fathers, who weren't a very diverse crowd, after all, (and those among them who were farsighted enough to wish to end slavery, such as Jefferson, wished to solve the problem of race relations through repatriation of blacks out of the country) passed the Naturalization Act of 1790, stating that only Whites could be citizens of the U.S., they followed it up, doubling down five years later with the Naturalization Act of 1795, stipulating the same pedigree requirements. Remember, these were the guys who said they wanted to secure the blessings of liberty for themselves and their progeny, not the progeny of Asia, or Africa, or Mexico. The fratricidal civil war, fought to prove that the union of states was not voluntary, but rather compulsory, did make major changes in our nation, especially in regards to Federal power, but the biggest change may have been the immigration act of 1965, which began flooding the U.S. with nonWhites. In 1960, our country was about 90% White. I definitely agree with you that things have changed since then, and as Whites are edged towards becoming a minority in the nation created of, by, and for us, your view is now the more popular and politically correct one. Whether the U.S. becoming more like Mexico or Zimbabwe is an improvement, or not, is subjective. However, attempting to twist the Founders into racial egalitarians is an unnecessary feat of gymnastics. I concede that their views, and mine, are no longer in the majority, at least insofar as are admitted publicly in polite society. At the moment, at least. ;->
 
I will never be convinced that the races ought to be separated, if we follow that ideologue then my wife should not be a citizen since she is half Native American and half Mexican and perhaps even I since I am Southern Cheyenne and German, I think most folks that preach the separation of races ought to dig deep into their own lineage, they may find out the truth of their so-called purity ;)
 
Sure, I understand your perspective. I've had a DNA test done, myself, as my wife has, too. I do find that a lot of people take the political position they take on issues concerning race, just like they do sexual orientation, based on what Aristotle called 'pathos', or emotion, or 'ethos', meaning their friends and relative's positions, rather than on 'logos', but in this case your position on the issue of race is just as much a result of your racial identity, as mine is a reflection of mine. That having been said, really, I learn a lot from your posts and have no need to debate the issue.
 
Yes, I'm sure that, based on their experience with the issue, American Indians could offer us all some interesting advice on how we should respond to illegal immigration, ourselves. At least they were brave enough to fight back when they were being invaded.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top