Climate Change

Just look countries like Venezuela, Mexico or whatever. Their countries have all the good wealth life chances in their land. ¿How could is possible to being starving in a land that the fruits are dropped everywhere (grows naturaly even in urban areas) and the water is already secured for decades. I just don't get it. I hope never leave my own country that have already everything to live well.
Socialism in South America is the best deal for FMI. All that countries are topped out on DEBT.

Now guess why Fed refuse to reduce the interest rates.

Ignacio said:

Just look countries like Venezuela, Mexico or whatever. Their countries have all the good wealth life chances in their land. ¿How could is possible to being starving in a land that the fruits are dropped everywhere (grows naturaly even in urban areas) and the water is already secured for decades. I just don't get it. I hope never leave my own country that have already everything to live well.
Socialism in South America is the best deal for FMI. All that countries are topped out on DEBT.

Now guess why Fed refuse to reduce the interest rates.

Click to expand...

Also all countries heavily influenced by religion

Arcticdude said:

I don't give a crap about what they do in other countries. Just because we have a few whiny bleeding hearts over here that think they need to "change the world", nothing is going to change. I think the only thing that needs to be changed is our open borders. Close the borders and keep the third world trash out.

Click to expand...

Bravo. It is vanity to live in one country and insist on telling people in another country how to live. Short of influence (war, etc), other countries should butt out. Venezuela wants socialism? Good for them, nobody else gets anything good or bad out of it. And when they're starving, nobody else gets the good or bad of that either. They made their bed, they sleep in it (or on the ground). The USA chooses capitalism and is an economic explosion, good for the USA. Why should any other country glean from that success? Or if the UK separates from the EU and becomes more prosperous, why would anyone else claim part of that?

Same could be said on the individual level. I invent a pill that cures cancer and start selling it for $50,000 a pill. Good for me! Why would anyone else financially benefit from my sweat & work? And if somebody refuses to pay $50k, they don't get the pill. Or if I refuse to sell one to Hillary Clinton? Nobody should force me to sell to anyone at their price or sell at all to someone. Ownership matters.

Now charity has been a tremendous result coming out of capitalism. But it's wealth voluntarily given, not stolen and redistributed.

TexasFreedom said:

Bravo. It is vanity to live in one country and insist on telling people in another country how to live. Short of influence (war, etc), other countries should butt out. Venezuela wants socialism? Good for them, nobody else gets anything good or bad out of it. And when they're starving, nobody else gets the good or bad of that either. They made their bed, they sleep in it (or on the ground). The USA chooses capitalism and is an economic explosion, good for the USA. Why should any other country glean from that success? Or if the UK separates from the EU and becomes more prosperous, why would anyone else claim part of that?

Same could be said on the individual level. I invent a pill that cures cancer and start selling it for $50,000 a pill. Good for me! Why would anyone else financially benefit from my sweat & work? And if somebody refuses to pay $50k, they don't get the pill. Or if I refuse to sell one to Hillary Clinton? Nobody should force me to sell to anyone at their price or sell at all to someone. Ownership matters.

Now charity has been a tremendous result coming out of capitalism. But it's wealth voluntarily given, not stolen and redistributed.

Click to expand...

The problem is that some "institutions" went to poor countries and offer a "miracle credit" that would be able to repair their failed forms of goverments, BUT they still think that socialism or populism as well could save them for the "terrible, evil and imperialist" capitalism way and guess what, they are still extremely poor but now with a gigantic debt to the IMF.

And that is bad for the US because they are using YOUR taxes and money to refill failed systems of goverments that can not afford the payments. You really need to control your own money because the Fed is making a mess giving credit to countries that can't afford this. Is like to give a million dollar to a child and waste it all in their Fortnite accounts.

I was just looking on Ebay for a copy on Phil Valentine's An Inconsistent Truth on dvd and found 1 but it was nearly $70 . No I can wait . But in the search there was a copy of Al Gore's an inconvenient truth for $1 and had 0 bids . Lol

Russell Brand did not kill himself. . . Conspiracy theory?

Yes he did. He did so at the 5:44 mark when he implicated Bill Gates. RIP Russell.

I think Dr. Richard Lindzen describes the scam the best. As a professor at MIT, he was frequently asked for opinion by the UN and various organizations pushing the lie of climate change. He holds a PhD in atmospheric science.

Dr. Lindzen said he had to participate because the college would get very angry with him if he didn't take the money these phony studies offered for his opinion.

He went on to say he'd write a paper debunking their beliefs and send it to them. They would then throw it in the trash, but put his name on as a "contributor" to the study. This tricks people into thinking he agrees with the results they "found".

This is how you get the infamous "97% of scientists agree".

One of many Dr. Lindzen videos:

Also, Patrick Moore tells similar stories and he is also a climatologist. Once a chapter president of Greenpeace, he tells how the movement was hijacked by Communism.

One of Patrick Moore's many videos:

https://gab.com/QAnon211/posts/107846280993822858

This is fantastic! The co-founder of the Weather Channel REALLY puts climate change liars in their place!!

The only real climate scientists are glacial geologists. They have been studying climate for hundreds of years, since Louis Agassiz Louis Agassiz - Wikipedia

Think about it. Four glaciations in the last 3 million years. Each time ice sheets advanced over the Northern Hemisphere. Then, they retreated and it got warmer again. So glacial scientists study earth's reasons for getting cold and then they study earth's reasons for warming back up. All the CNN-type climate scientists are johnny-come-lately frauds.

Milankovitch Cycles Milankovitch cycles - Wikipedia with superimposed homeostasis of Gaia Theory Gaia hypothesis - Wikipedia explains all post-Pleistocene climate flux.

Schattentarn said:

The only real climate scientists are glacial geologists. They have been studying climate for hundreds of years, since Louis Agassiz Louis Agassiz - Wikipedia

Click to expand...

I'd say Roy Spencer is a real climate scientist. The following is how he describes his credentials, but it's actually a bit modest. He and his former colleague, Dr. John Chrisy, are the world's foremost experts on global satellite temperature monitoring. He and Dr. Christy are both leading "climate deniers" as the left likes to put it, and have both been smeared extensively in the mainstream media.

Roy W. Spencer received his Ph.D. in meteorology at the University of Wisconsin-Madison in 1981. Before becoming a Principal Research Scientist at the University of Alabama in Huntsville in 2001, he was a Senior Scientist for Climate Studies at NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center, where he and Dr. John Christy received NASA’s Exceptional Scientific Achievement Medal for their global temperature monitoring work with satellites. Dr. Spencer’s work with NASA continues as the U.S. Science Team leader for the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer flying on NASA’s Aqua satellite.

Click to expand...

And this is what he says about man made global warming:
https://www.drroyspencer.com/global-warming-natural-or-manmade/

I like his ending of the article…

Climate change — it happens, with or without our help.

—Roy Spencer, PhD

DrHenley said:

I'd say Roy Spencer is a real climate scientist. The following is how he describes his credentials, but it's actually a bit modest. He and his former colleague, Dr. John Chrisy, are the world's foremost experts on global satellite temperature monitoring. He and Dr. Christy are both leading "climate deniers" as the left likes to put it, and have both been smeared extensively in the mainstream media.


And this is what he says about man made global warming:
https://www.drroyspencer.com/global-warming-natural-or-manmade/

Click to expand...

DrHenley, there is a very simple way to measure global temperatures and monitor changes. It has to do with the Schumann Resonance. Schumann resonances - Wikipedia

It seems that the earth's temperature is positively correlated with lightning strikes. This makes sense. The warmer, the more evaporation, the more thunderstorms. These thunderstorms generate lightning which actually "rings" the earth like a bell when it hits the ground. This ringing is the Schumann Resonance. The Schumann Resonance can be detected and we all have done it. It is the static sound on an AM radio at a given, but commonly used, frequency. It changes a bit day to day but it is always there. And each point of static is a lightning strike hitting the earth. Using an AM radio, the whole earth can be monitored at once, second by second, day by day. A machine can be employed to count the lighting strikes (points of static). More strikes means earth is warming, less means cooling.

But don't tell Greta about this.

GeorgiaPeachie said:

I like his ending of the article…

Climate change — it happens, with or without our help.

—Roy Spencer, PhD

Click to expand...

Earth's climate and weather have been changing every day for the last 4.6 billion years. It is just the way things are.

The lie of Climate Change will be embraced by the same nut-jobs who embrace masks.

They are lying. We know they are lying. They know we know they're lying. But they're still lying.

Tyranny is the reason. They want us to give in to their lies as a form of appeasement. To just get along. Humor them. Be nice.

Then the tyranny begins.

I don´t understand why so many of you don´t believe in climate change. I see climate change as at least one of the top 5 reason to start prepping.

AnarchistPrepper said:

I don´t understand why so many of you don´t believe in climate change. I see climate change as at least one of the top 5 reason to start prepping.

Click to expand...

You are not learning about the natural changes of the earth from those who don’t want your compliance and money. It really is that simple.

GeorgiaPeachie said:

You are not learning about the natural changes of the earth from those who don’t want your compliance and money. It really is that simple.

Click to expand...

Almost all scientists agree that man-made climate change is a real thing.

AnarchistPrepper said:

Almost all scientists agree that man-made climate change is a real thing.

Click to expand...

Only IF you believe the ones they call “all scientists”. Did you watch the interview with the Founder of The Weather Channel the other day? He actually told it quite clearly. There IS climate change…there IS NOT manmade climate change. Those “all scientists” that keep agreeing with big government….they GET ALL THEIR FUNDS FROM the same big government…IF…they put out reports agreeing with manmade climate change!!! Let that sink it. Then tell me, are you still going to be gullible enough to believe PAID LIARS?

AnarchistPrepper said:

Almost all scientists agree that man-made climate change is a real thing.

Click to expand...

That is an absolute lie.
You call yourself a prepper and yet you slavishly believe what the mainstream media tells you? It doesn't take but a few seconds on Google to find REAL climate scientists who haven't found any evidence that human contribution to climate change is significant.

Start with Roy Spencer.
Here are his qualifications:
Spencer received a B.S. in atmospheric sciences from the University of Michigan in 1978 and his M.S. and Ph.D. in meteorology from the University of Wisconsin–Madison in 1980 and 1982. His doctoral thesis was titled, A case study of African wave structure and energetics during Atlantic transit.

After receiving his Ph.D. in 1982, Spencer worked for two years as a research scientist in the Space Science and Engineering Center at the University of Wisconsin–Madison.

He then joined NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center as a visiting scientist in 1984, where he later became senior scientist for climate studies.

After leaving NASA in 2001, Spencer has been a principal research scientist at the University of Alabama in Huntsville (UAH). As well as his position at UAH, Spencer is currently the U.S. Science Team leader for the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer (AMSR-E) on NASA's Aqua satellite, a position he has held since 1994.

In 2001, he designed an algorithm to detect tropical cyclones and estimate their maximum sustained wind speed using the Advanced Microwave Sounding Unit (AMSU).

Spencer has been a member of several science teams: the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) Space Station Accommodations Analysis Study Team, Science Steering Group for TRMM, TOVS Pathfinder Working Group, NASA Headquarters Earth Science and Applications Advisory Subcommittee, and two National Research Council (NRC) study panels.

He is on the board of directors of the George C. Marshall Institute, and on the board of advisors of the Cornwall Alliance for the Stewardship of Creation.

Spencer's research work is funded by NASA, NOAA, DOE, and the DOT.