just goes to show Police HAVE lost control of the streets.

Doomsday Prepper Forums

Help Support Doomsday Prepper Forums:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
If I saw some piece of garbage drop kick a woman, cop or not, I'd beat his ###.

I'd be tempted to beat the crap out of anyone standing there filming it.

I dont think cops can afford to operate in the Liberal Fantasyland where a woman can go hands on with a 28 yr old male, possibly on drugs.

The sexes are equal. Except when their not.

I have seen male cops struggle with young ones on drugs, drug induced strength is a nightmare for male and female cops alike even for cops that hit the weights averday.
 
I am an old guy with old fashioned attitudes. I will not stand by a let a woman get hit, not going to happen. I will respect a cop and if needed assist the cop. The cop does not make eh laws and does not have a lot of choice when enforcing the law. If I don't like the current laws, then I will take it up with the politicians. AND yes, I still open and hold doors for Ladies. So sue me.
 
I am an old guy with old fashioned attitudes. I will not stand by a let a woman get hit, not going to happen. I will respect a cop and if needed assist the cop. The cop does not make eh laws and does not have a lot of choice when enforcing the law. If I don't like the current laws, then I will take it up with the politicians. AND yes, I still open and hold doors for Ladies. So sue me.
I understand and respect that. I make sure (at my job) that every woman gets walked out to her car when the shift ends at night.

My only earlier point is that you can assist a cop who's being assaulted in Britain, and end up in jail yourself and/or sued for every last penny . . . and I would take these realities into consideration before getting involved in a violent confrontation.
 
I'm glad that we don't have these problems here where I live.
As far as helping a cop in need, I probably wouldn't. There's a good chance the cop is deserving of a beating. The last murder that happened in my county about 4-5 years ago was by a cop. I get along good and respect our sheriff and 1 or 2 of his deputies, but the other 3 not so much. I feel that we have way too much police presence in this area. Can't say about other areas.
 
I understand and respect that. I make sure (at my job) that every woman gets walked out to her car when the shift ends at night.

My only earlier point is that you can assist a cop who's being assaulted in Britain, and end up in jail yourself and/or sued for every last penny . . . and I would take these realities into consideration before getting involved in a violent confrontation.

@Kevin L

I understand and I agree there are or could be negative repercussion to getting involved. Problem, this is still a Rule of Law time, so I cannot justify standing by and doing nothing. I know that is 180 degrees from my WROL stance but then I am a bit strange in my way of thinking. Leaving an Officer or woman to get beating, just not going happen. I have to be able to look in the mirror.

During a WROL event, that is a life and death decision that would involve all in my house hold, not just me. I would not disparage those that chose to not take action to assist the cop but I most certainly will and do detest those that record video for social media status. We each have our moral guideline and granted mine do get adjusted based on the safety or the family. Nobody would bother to sue, nothing to get and if I did go to jail, the family is still taken care of. So getting involved during a ROL time, I am just jeopardized myself. During a WROL, every decision by anybody in the family, puts everybody at risk.
 
@Kevin L

I am glad that you did bring up these points. People do need to know what the results of their decisions can be. I am not challenging anybody on what they would or would not do (except for the social media video folks).

I am not a good writer and my sentence structures are poor. Many a time I will use the term 'You" when I really mean is --- Them, they or some other form or reference to a group or identity, but not to identify an individual. With that being stated, I have been known to challenge a person by Name. If I say Billyxyz you are full of doo-doo, then that is directed at an individual. :D
 
@Kevin L

I am glad that you did bring up these points. People do need to know what the results of their decisions can be. I am not challenging anybody on what they would or would not do (except for the social media video folks).

I am not a good writer and my sentence structures are poor. Many a time I will use the term 'You" when I really mean is --- Them, they or some other form or reference to a group or identity, but not to identify an individual. With that being stated, I have been known to challenge a person by Name. If I say Billyxyz you are full of doo-doo, then that is directed at an individual. :D
I got that. Everything's good.
 
@bigpaul First take back your country and then you can take back your law enforcement. Arm the police (all of them) and then march into these NO-GO zones and give them an attitude adjustment. Any that fail to fall in line, deport. Your country, not the immigrants, they adjust or they go away. Same for my country.
 
@bigpaul First take back your country and then you can take back your law enforcement. Arm the police (all of them)...
I was watching some British cop show, and a policeman decided he needed to check out a gun, basically for self defense because he thought he was in danger. When he wore it into the police station, the other cops had conniption fits and he was told not to bring that thing back in there again.

To an American, it was so absurd I was laughing my ### off.

I don't think arming all the police in the UK will ever fly...too much hoplophobia among the police.
 
@DrHenley

When enough of them get their heads handed (literally) to themselves, they will see the writing on the wall. Unfortunately the writing will be in their own blood. SIASD
 
we do have armed cops in Britain, they are called "the armed response unit" but not your ordinary cop.
What we call "Swat Teams." Dressed and equipped more like paramilitary units than regular police. Yes, I was aware of them, hence the use of the word "all."

Our law enforcement is decentralized. We have entirely different law enforcement organizations in the countryside than in the cities. Here, "Sheriffs" are not ceremonial, but are generally the chief law enforcement authorities of the county like the English sheriffs of old. Usually it is the sheriff's departments that have jurisdiction outside the cities, and the sheriffs are elected by the county at large. You get too many people out in the country complaining about not getting response from law enforcement, and somebody else gets elected as sheriff next time around. Sheriff's deputies are usually more in touch with the community than city police, and are much more likely to have citizens come to their aid than are city police. Sheriffs and their deputies are generally much more supportive of individual firearm ownership than are Police chiefs and city policemen. Hell, across the river in Alabama, the Russel County Sheriff's department lets the general public use their indoor shooting range!
 
Last edited:

Latest posts

Back
Top