I think being moderate and somewhat middle of the road is a good approach to most things in life.
I really don't have much use for 'middle of the road' in most things. An example, water temperature. People think lukewarm is the way to go. For any of my Christian friends here, you'll find 'lukewarm' used exactly once in the Bible and it is as far from a compliment.
Also 'Moderates' only work with Republicans. John McStain is the perfect example. Name a single 'moderate' democrat? Name one that didn't vote for Obamascare. Name one that's voting for this tax reform. It's a 1 way street, and life doesn't work that way.
But lukewarm. People think it means a nice compromise. But when you implement it, it's the equivalent of putting one foot in a bucket of hot water and the other in an ice bucket. On average, you are not comfortable! Same goes for politics. Choices are usually binary. Either you can own guns and carry them or you can't. Either you bring muslim terrorists into the country or you don't. Either you think the gov't can spend your hard earned money wiser or you can.
Brent, let's take these first two, guns and muslim terrorists. Tell me what a 'moderate' stance is. For help, here's a conservative stance on these:
Guns: 2nd Amendment means what it says. People in general (not felons, nuts, kids...) can own as many guns as they want, as much ammo as they want, and carry them practically anywhere (with CCL). Advanced weapons require permits (full auto, suppressors, etc), but are available to the general public as well. Guns are encouraged for people to own to protect themselves from whatever threat comes their way, worst of which is the gov't itself.
Muslims: Muslim Terrorists are a problem. The ban by Trump is perfectly legal. Stopping refugees from problem countries should be halted completely. Vetting could and should be tougher from some countries than others. We can pick from the brightest and best to come to our country, not just any notjub. There is no 'moral' reason for open borders, it's exactly the opposite. Loyalty goes to our citizens, not criminals who come here intending harm. And if some are vetted due to tougher restrictions, so be it.
So Brent, have at it. What is a 'moderate' version of these two? This should be an interesting discussion and I hope you put some thought into your response.